• Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
    126·
    12 days ago

    I love that the shark can take down whole modern digital infrastructure, but it can’t stop C developers from writing dynamic arrays.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      54·
      12 days ago

      Some species are just perfectly adapted to their niche…

      C developers were already writing dynamic arrays before computer data was running through underseas cables.

    • psud@aussie.zoneEnglish
      4·
      11 days ago

      I think it’s Russian uninsured ships “accidentally” dragging anchors across major fibre optic links rather than sharks chewing them

          • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            1·
            11 days ago

            The “g” in “doing” on the left side of the artwork is backwards.

            Could be other artifacts that don’t seem right

            • four@lemmy.zipEnglish
              191·
              11 days ago

              I think it’s supposed to be DNS, just in a crappy handwriting. Which seems consistent with the other handwritten text

            • LiveLM@lemmy.zipEnglish
              14·
              11 days ago

              Sure, that’s wacky. But everything else is fine, things look hand sketched, the non-connecting and slightly crooked lines are just the fact of a fast sketch, AI artifacts don’t really look like this.
              And above all I don’t think AI would be able to parse the original meme and adapt it into the “End of Evangelion” meme template while still keeping the elements from the original (the shark biting the fiber cable and the “AI” handcrank for example) or without falling into that stupid synthetic “Anime/Ghibli” style.

              Edit: I’m pretty sure that text says “DNS”, since there where two “DNS” pegs on the original name, it’s just that the lines of the letter “N” didn’t properly connect and the letter “S” came out a little crooked.

    • Eq0@literature.cafe
      32·
      12 days ago

      Wow! I’m quite annoyed that it was fixed by restoring the previous package while the author had explicitly deleted it. That seems contrary to the laymen interpretation of code ownership

    • Mika@piefed.caEnglish
      24·
      12 days ago

      npm is a bunch of cucks. Folded to the lawyer threats immediately but ignored the authors wish to remove his work off platform, and made sure it’s no longer possible?

      I have to remember never to use them to share my code. God bless I’m not a node dev.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.worldEnglish
        27·
        12 days ago

        I love how the NPM CEO gave him the tool/command to remove all his work from the platform. What a dummy.

        I also support the idea that he should be allowed to remove his work. It should have been republished according to the license. With a forked new name. IMO. But I know what a nightmare that would be.

  • Fuck u/spez@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    31·
    10 days ago

    It looks like the AI screw jack is reverse threaded which wouldn’t be obvious until you begin turning it… and that actually isn’t a bad metaphor for today’s AI.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        2·
        9 days ago

        That makes no sense. It’s a chart of what stuff is built on. Cloudflare isnt built on aws, and same for AWS though AWS does have services that use Cloudflare. They’re distinct and should not be stacked.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    21·
    12 days ago

    This implies removing the unpaid opensource developers balances out The AI in short term and idk how to feel ahout that.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      17·
      12 days ago

      Nah, the angle would be too aggressive - unless the boards have an extremely high friction coefficient, they would slide off to the right (along with anything on top of them).

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    171·
    11 days ago

    “Whatever Microsoft is doing” hilarious!. Microsoft is such a total retarded company. Unfortunately Google turned evil too. Any for profit company can turn evil. I’m never going to place full trust in anything that is not 100% fully open source.

    • Bababasti@feddit.org
      12·
      11 days ago

      Any for profit company can turn evil.

      Any for profit company can will turn evil. Fixed this for you.

      • altphoto@lemmy.today
        1·
        11 days ago

        Thanks. I was going for that. I work for a small company and I still think a small for profit is also evil.

  • tomiant@piefed.socialEnglish
    14·
    12 days ago

    You know, it’s like, I look at an old time clock, or a mechanical cog, or something. And I think, if I were to throw a bug in there, at the right time at the right moment, at the wrong gear…

    Next week on my podcast: Jenga!

    • EnsignWashout@startrek.website
      334·
      12 days ago

      What’s up with the Rust hate?

      The Rust community keeps trying to rewrite key pieces of Linux that aren’t broken.

      They probably have the right idea, in the long run, but it’s still fun to give them a hard time about it.

      • dan@upvote.au
        33·
        12 days ago

        I think the real issue isn’t the rewrites, it’s the fact that Ubuntu started using the new Rust coreutils even though they weren’t ready for production yet. uutils hasn’t even reached version 1.0 yet, and still fails some compatibility tests.

        • exu@feditown.comEnglish
          41·
          12 days ago

          It’s an intermediate release, so the perfect time for Ubuntu to evaluate uutils for their next LTS

          • dan@upvote.au
            71·
            11 days ago

            LTS is supposed to contain stable components though. They really should wait for a stable (1.0) release before committing to it.

          • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            71·
            11 days ago

            I’ve heard this argument before, and it makes no sense. You evaluate new core components internally as part of developing your distro, not in releases because “they’re not LTS”