• Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They won’t address the mental health problems because it’s all part of a strategy to keep people scared.

    • RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also for hospital systems it’s wildly unprofitable. You make your money in two places in medicine, elective surgeries and in the emergency department. Mental healthcare is slow, in the extreme cases you’re dealing with unpleasant patients that are hostile to the care you’re trying to provide, and you often have to house them and feed them for extended periods of time knowing they don’t have any money to reimburse you.

      That’s why the hospital I’m working at has built a multimillion dollar cardiac surgery tower (not a unit, not a few floors, an entire tower), but scrapped the plans to rebuild the aging and woefully inadequate inpatient psych facility.

      If we can’t squeeze every cent from you we will only do the bare minimum that the CMC requires from us.

      • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Making healthcare a for profit endeavour is not in the best interests of society as a whole.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Capitalism should exist for non essentials only. I don’t care that candy factories and stores aren’t controlled by the government/its workers, but I sure as hell care that my government is trying to introduce more and more private care facilities in our healthcare system!

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Because one is realistic (a system where essential needs are all nationalised but non essentials aren’t, giving a place for greedy people who feel that need to make profit through their work) and the other isn’t (expecting greed to disappear).

                  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    No, I’m realistic, some people will always be greedy, better give them a way to satisfy themselves than have them corrupting a system that tries to eliminate them or to have them work in the black market.

                    It’s the same as drugs, you have better control over hard drugs users by making drugs legal, providing it and taking charge of them than you do by making it illegal and seeing them shoot themselves in an abandoned building with whatever junk they can find.

                  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Oh and I didn’t quit anything because that’s been my opinion forever, I just never believed in complete nationalisation/seizure of the means of production.

    • signs23@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could adress it, but it wont save the problem. Look at europe, we ban guns, we dont shoot people every day. We still have mental health problems.