do the right wing guys think it’s like a draco malfoy thing where they’re a good guy underneath?

like when it’s like a lady and a cop and the lady seems like a normal sorta boring suburban lady

do you know what i mean. this is one of the things where if you try to ask an AI bot it yells at you

  • Narrrz@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    out of curiosity, did you use a bot to write this? something about the frequency with which you use their username to refer to them stood out to me.

    if that’s not the case, I wonder why it is that using a proper name instead of a pronoun or stand-in reference jumps out to me as unnatural…

    • dreadgoat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve just been on the internet a long time and pride myself on writing with precision. I am a rather bot-like writer, Narrrz.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ve noticed a tendency of late by some in confusing step-by-step building of arguments in written form with the product of Chat AIs.

      Don’t know if it’s meant as an insult, is a way to try and plant doubt in the minds of the audience without actually addressing the argument being made, or if it’s people genuinelly not being familiar with structured thinking (which, for example, tends to be common amongst scientists and engineers because of their work) hence feeling it’s machine-like.

      This really is how people trained in analytical thinking will figure things out, build theories and put together solutions and if you’re any good at it will most definitelly not include “decorations” such emotionally charged language.

      (The funny bit is that Chat GPT and the like would be less unemotional, as those things are text-assemblers incapable or rationalization and trained in general language samples, so they actually fluff-up text like most people).