• monobot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was with you until “TikTok and most other corporate social media”. It is all other" parts of internet that are not allowed for 13 year olds.

    • Sentinian@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would assume the average school child is more concerned about instagram or tiktok vs other parts of the internet. I would not be against finding a way to limit access to other sites, but I would prefer a privacy respecting way. Just requiring an ID is a shitty solution and screws over adults more then it helps kids (they will find grandma’s id.) If a privacy valuing solution is brought up I would be 1000% supporting it.

      • monobot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think trchnical solution is not s problem, if we decide what needs to be applied we can do it.

        If kid finds grandmother’s id - it is simple enough, punish grandma for providing her id, it will teach adult to be responsible. Additionally, not all kids will be able to do it. I doubt they will follow us.

        My opinion, eve if it is obvious, parents are responsible Punish them for not protecting their kids.

      • ArcticCircleSystem@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wouldn’t that effectively restrict a lot of platforms to people age 16 or older? I am a bit worried that such an id law could cut off younger queer teens dealing with abuse that’s severe enough to qualify as abuse in the academic sense, but not in the eyes of the law, from vital community… ~Strawberry