• Tavarin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because I wouldn’t have spent 100 hours playing it if I didn’t enjoy it.

    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s you though, that doesn’t translate for everyone so I think it’s a weird way to argue about how good something is. If someone argues that a game is good because people spend so many hours on it, it tells me nothing at all about the quality of the game other than you don’t get so irritated you quit immediately. If you spent 100 hours on a game and 60 on another, is the 100 hour game automatically better?

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For me, usually yes. And I’m the one debating here, and making the point from my perspective, so for this conversation my argument stands. Cyberpunk is a really good game, that I’ve had a ton of fun playing, and I genuinely enjoyed my time with it more than most games.

        • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not trying to fucking argue I’m just saying my thoughts, can you stop downvoting me lol. I was trying to share my perspective, not convince you ffs.