‘The Presidential oath, which the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment surely knew, requires the President to swear to ‘preserve, protect and defend’ the Constitution — not to ‘support’ the Constitution,’ read a filing from the former president’s attorneys
Bear with me for a minute: why should the Constitution be an immutable document? It was written hundreds of years ago by slave-owners coming off of countless years of British oppression.
It would be like if Palestine gained independence, Hamas wrote a constitution, and every government for centuries afterwards followed that constitution.
It isn’t immutable. There are already 27 amendments.
What are you actually arguing in relation to the subject of this post?
Your post feels odd… like a drunk driver killed a kid and then you came in here and said, “now hear me out, the person was 13 years old, does that actually qualify as a kid?”