• bonus_crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    love fairphone but i cant go bacl from graphene os. its so nice not having google attacjed to everything.

  • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    a few things i like:

    • moments is an interesting concept
    • it says you can toggle off gemini ai. this is good
    • display goes from 10-120hz for battery
    • ultrawide selfie camera
    • microsd card slot!
    • power button fingerprint scanner, way better than underscreen
  • Ambersand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    One plus did the same thing. Now they’re no different then all the expensive brands out there.

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    OTG compatible is a rare feature, I have an endoscope camera that uses OTG, but not a compatible phone.

    Also, no mention of a headphone jack.

  • Bjarne@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Was really hoping to see a Fairphone 6a. Similar to the Google Pixel Series. Just a cheap version of it. I really don’t need 120Hz, OLED or “No Bezels” all i want is big battery and a headphone jack that is all.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Worth noting buying a second hand phone is still better in every aspect and sadly 2nd hand Samsung from 3 years ago is still better and cheaper. Though Fairphone is getting closer with each release!

  • carrylex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Compared to the Fairphone 5 it has some improvements but also a few downsides:

    Pro:

    • It’s a bit smaller (~4mm) and lighter (~20g)
    • Slightly better camera (future tests will tell how much better)
    • 120 Hz display
    • More RAM and storage (although I feel that the previous 6GB/128GB option was also sufficient for most users)
    • WiFi 6E Tri-Band (however you will likely never need this speed)
    • Bluetooth 5.4
    • Slightly larger battery

    Con:

    • Backpanel now requires a screwdriver
    • Display has less resolution/PPI
    • Performance of processor will likely be nearly identical to predecessor (however it’s more efficient and modern)
    • Downgrade to USB 2
    • 600€

    My conclusion: Overall the improvements are ok, however just releasing the Fairphone 5 with a newer SoC might have been the better/more cost effective choice. Sacrificing display resolution for 120 Hz feels also quite wrong. 600€ is very pricy for a phone like this. Cutting some premium features away like the 120 Hz display or a bit of RAM and storage (that you can extend anyway with an SD card) might have saved enough to get the launch price down to somewhere near 500€ which would make it accessible for a wider audience.

  • Luca@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Fairphone is probably going to be my new phone when I upgrade.