• SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is effectively a Pigouvian tax, and will absolutely keep some people from smoking.

    Also higher prices do not necessarily mean the industry is making more money. Far more likely, given the saturation of competition, that they simply cost more to make.

    • Case@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget a lot of the cost of a pack of smokes is often more due to taxation than the cost of the product, even if you include things likes all the overhead for marketing and legal and shit.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s because of aforementioned Pigouvian taxes. The entire point is pricing some people out of purchasing them.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is not an expression of an opinion. These are statements of fact. As in our other discussion, I am simply explaining things to you.

        You not liking these facts does not make them less true.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Would you like a citation on what Pigouvian taxes are, how the cigarette industry is flooded with competition, or that putting further regulations on products makes them more expensive to produce?

            I assumed you could Google any of these but I can do it for you. Fair warning, you’ll be getting a “let me Google that for you” link.

            Not one of these facts is even remotely controversial so my mind is a bit boggled that you’d even try to contest any of them