• pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your new government, presumably.

      Though if you can’t trust it to faithfully enforce its laws, why have it? Or any government, for that matter?

      Like, you can take the fear of discrimination to justify not having anything

      • mintyfrog@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You cannot trust a government to routinely create arbitrary standards used to regulate that same government.

        This is different from a government enforcing your average law because this law applies to the election process itself and allows for significant bias. Where there is room for bias in this process, it will be taken advantage of. Look at gerrymandering.

        What problem does your law actually solve? If people are willing to elect a candidate, isn’t that a sufficient measure of competency? At best you’re creating an elitist state controlled by those who set the bar for competency, and at worst you’re creating a one party state.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then you can’t have any government, or really, any meaningful social interaction.

          All democratic governments are built on the assumption they’ll be acted upon in good faith, because without good faith, no cooperation or society is possible. All a society is is a group of people either working together in good faith.

          If you want to go off and live by the law of the jungle, then by all means, go ahead. But the rest of us will move on without you.