Why virtual reality makes a lot of us sick, and what we can do about it.

  • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Posted this reply in another instance, but several years ago researchers found that adding a virtual nose dramatically decreased motion sickness. However, I haven’t seen any developers adding one in games. I wonder if it’d help.

    • lloram239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Outside of that news article, I have literally never seen a single VR game use a virtual nose.

    • Danc4498@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      When the camera movies without me physically moving, I am throwing up immediately. Do you mean a virtual nose would fix that?

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Findings showed the virtual nose allowed people using the Tuscany villa simulation to play an average of 94.2 seconds longer without feeling sick, while those playing the roller coaster game played an average of 2.2 seconds longer.

        Yeah instead of throwing up immediately, you won’t throw up until 2.2 seconds in. Problem solved!

        • justgohomealready@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The “Tuscany Villa” is an ancient demo that I tried in the Oculus DK1 in like 2014 or so, and it made me sick for hours. It uses very fast continuous movement instead of teleport, and it has a set of stairs that will make you instantly throw up if you try to climb them.

          It’s is perfectly possible to create VR experiences that will not make anyone nauseous, Moss being a good example.

          • Turun@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you are saying that 90s is a remarkable improvement?

            I would expect a huge difference in the usefulness of a simulated nose, depending on the content. In a roller coaster the movement of your head (rotation) and the movement of the carriage (translation) are separate and clearly defined this way. You control the Rotation while the game controls the translation. I don’t know what this villa demo is, but depending on how the movement is controlled, an unintuitive and unnatural system is bound to make almost everyone nauseous.

            • justgohomealready@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Any app that moves the camera (or thw whole world) without user input will make people sick, it’s just a law of good VR. Any app that doesn’t render at a stable 72fps+ will make people sick. Any app that simulates things that make people sick in real life, will also make people sick in VR.

              On the other hand, any app that keeps a stable 90fps, that uses teleport with a very short fade instead of thumbstick movement, and that never messes with the camera position, will not make people sick.

              Most people who have tried VR and have felt sick, were basically victims of awful, non-optimized VR experiences, and awful VR hardware like Google Cardboard and variants.

  • Haus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m in the other camp. The first time I squeezed my 155m spaceship through the tiny mouth of a rotating space station in VR, I wept like a baby. (An Anaconda in Elite: Dangerous)

  • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What kind of statistic is 40-70%? For women It “goes up to 80%”, where does it start then? The numbers, what do they mean?

    • magus@l.tta.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t even lies, damned lies, and statistics territory - it’s just nothing. I know VR motion sickness exists (I still get it even after an uncomfortable amount of time in SteamVR sometimes) but that’s… that’s not anything

  • greenskye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like all I see in the VR space is endless articles on new hardware and basically nothing on quality VR games. I always thought I’d upgrade my Vive to an Index or something better one day, but so far the only compelling reason is HL: Alyx and I’m not spending that kind of money on a single game.

  • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    And you even have some vr fans just blindly claiming that all games should use gliding for movement and that having the option to teleport ruins the game even if they don’t use it. even though gliding (they call it natural locomotion) makes people sick because it’s obviously unnatural. They claim there is no need for movement systems that don’t induce motion sickness because it’s a matter of getting used to “natural locomotion” an anyone who doesn’t get better is because they are lying🙄.

    • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Although with most games, the accessibility options need to be there (even when they sometimes aren’t), some games incorporate their movement mechanics into gameplay heavily. Take BONELAB for example. Great game, but simply impossible to play for some people due to the movement. Adding teleporting (or really any accessibility movement option) would simply ruin it though, as the entire game is based around physics based interactions, walking, running, jumping, climbing, etc.

      • chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bonelab literally made me sick for hours. I tried to power through it and that’s when I realized VR wasn’t for me.

        It’s a slick game…but oof…I just can’t do it.

  • MudMan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    People get very stuck on this part, and I genuinely don’t think it’s the issue.

    Look, l have very decent “VR legs” at this point, but I’m still not a likely spender and I don’t play long games in VR or crack out my headsets very often at all.

    The issue is not motion sickness or space or tracking stations. The issue is having to put something on my face and not being comfortably on my couch, free to go pee or get a snack without removing a thing from my face.

    And yeah, it’s uncomfortable. That’s part of it. A version of it that looks and feels like glasses would be less of a problem. But the thing is, those aren’t a thing that exists, they are not even an incremental step that we can get to at any point, and also TVs and monitors look just fine.

    VR is a neat trick, and I gladly keep my headsets around for any time when something actually interesting pops up. But it was never going to be the next big thing.

    • SamboT@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bigscreen Beyond is a new vr headset that is a little bigger than pool goggles. It’s manufactured based off of a lidar scan of your face, and is supposed to be very comfortable.

      Additionally full color passthrough is becoming more of a common feature so you can see the real world in good definition while wearing the headset. Also some models hinge the display upwards off of your face.

      We are getting there. Personally I play for hours a day. Sometimes multiple 4 hour sessions if it’s a free weekend for me. I agree we need more experiences. But it will come.

      • MudMan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        See? No, this is what I mean. It’s not this. It’s not even Apples insane thing.

        It’s not an incremental progression that will take us there. I will not pop out a headset of any kind and put it on my face as my default mode of engagement. Won’t happen. Not a thing.

        It could be shaped like pool goggles, it could have color passthrough, it could have perfect resolution and field of view, it could solve the nausea problem, it won’t matter. Because the reality is that anything that straps to my face and substitutes my normal free field of view is by definition and by design a secondary device.

        It’s cool that you like what they offer, and hey, unlike the weird people out there mourning Stadia you can still use all of these things.

        But a replacement for PCs, TVs or consoles they are not.

  • justgohomealready@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read this as “40-70% of VR developers don’t know what they are doing”. What needs to be done to avoid motion sickness has been known for a long while now.

  • zesty@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    VR is like flying cars. It’s a stupid idea that sounds cool.

  • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know I’m not really in a virtual world. A helmet isn’t going to fool me.