I can’t really think of a reason for that as Reddit is hated somewhat equally by “both” sides of the spectrum. It’s just something I find interesting.

  • DLSchichtl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, we just no longer feel the need to tolerate you. You do not adhere to our (pretty fucking simple) philosophy of leaving people be unless a crime has been committed. That’s all tolerance is. You dont need to ask questions. You dont have to remember a list of strawman pronouns. You just have to mind your fuckin’ business. The fed isn’t going to coddle you like reddit did. We want you the fuck out. Fuck off back to EH with the rest of the question askers.

    • irkli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The right! Leaving people alone! Lol! Lefties want “treat every one well” and the right passes law after law removing rights from specific lists of people, starting with those they seem as politically weakest (trans, gay, poor, black). The party of “small government” sure wants a lot of social control laws.

      And yes explicitly, lefties want to remove any “right” to treat people “you don’t categorically like” badly.

      Fuck the right wing, seriously wtf.

      Stop being mean to everyone. Then no one would care about you at all.

      • Md1501@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s also not forget that the hate is justified and amplified by their religion.

    • zombuey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      well the right thinks anything that makes you not exactly like them is a crime. Including thinking and having different opinions and ideas. Therefore they do adhere?

      I think you might be leaning towards the paradox of intolerance and the recent solution for it which has become very popular.

      A tolerant society must be intolerant of intolerance.

      This philosophical concept seems paradoxical but actually it’s been solved via another philosophical concept. The social contract. Hate speech in almost every instance violates the social contract thus putting those who engage in it in violation of the social contract. It is not being intolerant at that juncture to remove that person from society. It is not intolerance but a violation of contractual obligation.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And funnily enough, these bigots nearly always hail from “the land of the free”. Where “free” apparently only applies to their own ability to freely attack others and try restrict their freedom.