• saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Carney himself has said he wants to run a clean campaign and not do attack ads, I know how often politicians renege on that, but i hope Carney sticks to it, i think it will ruin the unifying atmosphere that has him polling so well. Let her crazy speak for itself.

    • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I also hate attack ads, but… Is it really an attack ad if you simply play the recording of what someone else said without editing it to make it worse (because it’s already sufficient bad in its whole, truthful self)?

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I would like to see an implied message that PP is a traitor, which he is with his “respect” for the white house.

    • That's My Sandwich!@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Hated Attack ads, attack ads are only create bigger division. as if it is not divided enough now. however its gonna be tricky when the opposite side are playing dirty.

    • Dearche@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      As much as I want to sea traitors like her burn, I do agree on the principal of a clean election. People have been turning against PP precisely because he openly and only fights dirty, purely talking about how bad everybody else is without putting up a single point of good he will do the country if elected.

      We need positive forward-facing politicians in power, with anybody more interested in pulling others down be put into the dirt. Winning the election with a purely positive platform without attacking anybody is the best election we can have, even if it doesn’t actually change the system in the short term.