• SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Cron already exists and is established as the solution in this space. It’s also used as the model for a lot of other timer services outside the Linux kernel.

    • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      cron is quite inadequate for condition based scheduling. Instead of million obscure ways to achieve this inside the command that cron executes, systemd timers give us a standard ONE way to do things.

      I feel like systemd timers follow unix philosophy better than cron at this day and age.

    • BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Have you read the article? The fourth paragraph lists improvements systemd timers bring over cron:

      Cron is easy, very simple and robust mechanism to execute periodic tasks on a *nix server, and is available by default on all popular Linux distributions. However, cron suffers from some issues:

      • If the system is down when the cron needs to run, the cron will be missed

      • There is no built-in status monitoring

      • There are no built-in logs

      • If you want to execute pre/post commands (for example by pinging an external service for success/failure) you have to do it inside the script itself

      All of these issues are addressed with systemd services and timers, as the authors explains in details.