This is one of those takes that’s so controversial I’m afraid to post it, which is exactly why I have to.

I neither endorse nor disavow this, and no, I’m not in the picture.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    51·
    12 hours ago

    There isn’t really an option with no costs to them, though, is there?

    I mean isn’t this article what this is about? That there is a way to help rehabilitate these offenders without having them commit these crimes again or even for the first time? The article begs the question in asking “Why aren’t we exploring how successful this would be if we used it on a larger scale?”. Which is a fair question to ask.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      21·
      12 hours ago

      I suppose it depends how effective this actually is. I’m kinda skeptical that you can talk someone out of being a pedophile, or into being less of a pedophile. That’s not usually how sexual preferences work (mandatory note that most preferences are harmless; some people try to muddy the waters).

      We haven’t even seriously tried it, though, because the politics of it are very bad. That’s definitely dumb.

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        41·
        12 hours ago

        I didn’t take this as a method of changing sexual preferences. But rather a way to help these people avoid acting on these “urges”.

        But yes, I do agree that it really depends on how effective it actually is. It nay be that this is just a case of having a few good examples but will not reflect in a broad real life scenario.