• abff08f4813c@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Any argument, I guess, that would oppose those findings, in our opinion, aren’t necessarily based in fact.”

    On the one hand, I kind of agree that the arguments presented so far seem pretty thin and were addressed by the report already. So would agree with this statement for those arguments.

    On the other hand, this seems to discount the possibility that there might be any counterargument against the approach in the report period, regardless of that counterargument’s validity. In terms of safety, I’ve not seen any yet, but I at least allow for the possibility that some might exist.

    Though, the fact that the provincial gov’t hasn’t provided any yet, despite being highly motivated to do so, might mean that there aren’t really any.

    Even so, I think one should take the attitude of being open to addressing any counterarguments as they come in on rather than dismissing everything outright in advance.