• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Who would you have define hate speech in the US? SCOTUS?

    Many citizens may agree on the definition, but I wouldn’t trust our government to draw those lines.

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      Many countries have working anti-hate speech laws. It’s not really a big problem for freedom of speech in those countries.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Those countries don’t have partisan polarization propaganda preschoolers writing their legislation.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          While often better than in the US, you shouldn’t overestimate the state of democracy in other countries.

          A lot of the far right parties in Europe are successfully copying the polarization tactics from the US.

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        *Freedom of Expression

        We don’t have Freedom of Speech, but we do have Freedom of Expression. Important difference, even though it may freak out some Americans.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Except for the countries that have anti-hate laws that are deliberately vague and specifically used to jail anyone who is disliked by the government. China and Russia come to mind as examples, but I’m sure they aren’t the only ones.

        Besides hate-speech, I’m not sure how much should be censored really. China does a lot of censoring to ‘protect’ their citizens from everything, I’m not sure this would be a good thing even if that really was a goal.

        And protecting children from traumatising content looks like another good thing to do, but under that banner I usually see governments doing whatever they want without caring about children past using their image.