The U.S. government’s road safety agency is again investigating Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” system, this time after getting reports of crashes in low-visibility conditions, including one that killed a pedestrian.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says in documents that it opened the probe on Thursday with the company reporting four crashes after Teslas entered areas of low visibility, including sun glare, fog and airborne dust.

In addition to the pedestrian’s death, another crash involved an injury, the agency said.

Investigators will look into the ability of “Full Self-Driving” to “detect and respond appropriately to reduced roadway visibility conditions, and if so, the contributing circumstances for these crashes.”

  • PeroBasta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because it is generally proven to save lifes. You’ll never hear of “thanks for the auto-brake system no one got injured and everything was boring as usual” but it happened a lot (also to me in first person).

    I don’t like Musk but in general its a good thing to push self driving cars IMO. I drive 2 hours per day and the amount of time where I see retarded people doing retarded stuff at the wheel is crazy.

    • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This is the thing. Musk and everything his company does in terms of labour and marketing, and just their whole ethos is unethical as fuck, and I can’t stand that as a society we are celebrating Tesla.

      But self driving cars are not inherently bad or dangerous to persue as a technological advancement.

      Self driving cars will kill people, they’ll will hit pedestrians and crash into things.

      So do cars driven by humans.

      Human driven cars kill a lot of people.

      Self driving cars need to be safer than human driven cars to even consider letting them on the the road, but we can’t truly expect a 0% accident rate on self driving cars in the early days of the technology when we don’t expect that of the humanity driven cars.

    • ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Air travel is generally safer than driving too, but every accident is studied thoroughly. Self-driving is fine, but anyone trying to implement it should be held to a high standard. Boeing slacked off and they’re facing some backlash.

    • Konala Koala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, it is not generally proven to save lives, you are listening to lies somewhere. Its not a good thing to push self-driving cars and Musk is the one being retarded. Plus he supports Trump and not Harris.

      • PeroBasta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The technology behind it is proven to save lifes. The reaction time of a full brake to stop a car crash i had the “luck” of experiencing on a Volkswagen was outstanding.

        Same thing for the lane assist function if you are sleepy

        • Konala Koala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Same thing for the lane assist function if you are sleepy

          If you are sleepy behind the wheel, you need to pull over, get off the road, and take a rest.

          • PeroBasta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Thanks mom. I brought cases to prove my point I’m not saying you should go on a road trip while sleepy.