• Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    It’ll be hilarious when their rent gets jacked up to cover empty buildings. 🤪

    • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’m not sure which locations they are forcing employees back to, but Amazon itself isn’t likely paying rent, they do own some buildings. That is an investment they use in their listed assets.

      What’s happening is that other businesses that do rent building space aren’t getting enough revenue due to decreased traffic (think the corner coffee shop that had a steady stream of regulars every morning but now doesn’t). This causes them to leave, driving up the rent of other renters, and you get a “mortgage backed security like” crisis. Amazon doesn’t give two shits about the businesses that leave, or what they pay in rent - they care that their building value grows. Can’t do that if real estate is vacating in the nearby area.

      Which to that I say: good, fuck em

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        Maybe the “risk takers” who invested in corporate real estate, just before corporate real estate became useless, should all fail. Idk why anyone believes the bullshit that they should be jacking up prices to cover their failures. Their whole existence is avoiding risk while calling themselves risk takers and then blaming everyone else when gambling for a living doesn’t work

        • peopleproblems@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          Risk means sometimes shit goes south. I’ve seen a lot of shit not going south.

          Credit Suisse folded, Archeagos folded. The whole Evergrande thing in Chinaa. But I think that’s it in recent history