In the physical world, the limits are clear: no democratic government is permitted to monitor citizens in their homes without a court order, even to prevent domestic violence or child sexual abuse. In the digital world, though, the answer remains unresolved. Child safety advocates believe that governments must be able to unlock private messages, while tech companies and privacy activists see a smokescreen for mass government surveillance.

  • Big P@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    They want to do client side scanning which technically keeps E2E encryption but basically destroys the principle behind it. Today it’s CSAM, tomorrow its terrorism related phrases, next year its “anti-government sentiment”

    • Lmaydev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which won’t affect the majority of people at all. Which is how they get away with it.

      The people who do care will just move to safer alternatives.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Literally. I believe most criminals aren’t using WhatsApp. Moreso some weird thing called “EncroChat”

        • Lmaydev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly.

          But you do hear a lot about Facebook groups for it and shit. I’m guessing many of them are just stupid as fuck.

          Which I guess is the target of this.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If they’re that stupid can’t they just have people infiltrate the group like they do with encrochat