BrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Interesting Global News@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 year agoJudge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search enginearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1299arrow-down13file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1296arrow-down1external-linkJudge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search enginearstechnica.comBrikoX@lemmy.zipM to Interesting Global News@lemmy.zipEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square29fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
Archived version: https://archive.ph/73oYB Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230912191216/https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/09/judge-in-us-v-google-trial-didnt-know-if-firefox-is-a-browser-or-search-engine/
minus-squareyip-bonk@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 year agoMember when microsoft was convicted of being a monopoly? Only took a decade and several judges who didn’t know what a browser was. And then nothing changed. Good times.
minus-squaretallwookie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agolet’s be honest, it’s probably the same judges.
Member when microsoft was convicted of being a monopoly? Only took a decade and several judges who didn’t know what a browser was. And then nothing changed. Good times.
let’s be honest, it’s probably the same judges.