• Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    27 days ago

    As much as I’d love that idea, I would guess there are financial reasons to not allow things like that, as both advertisers and credit card companies seem to really hate erotic and erotic adjacent media.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      They mostly hate them because people tend to do chargebacks when other people find out they made those purchases.

      Or they do chargebacks in the wake of post nut clarity when they regret giving money to an OF.

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          27 days ago

          Chargebacks are a huge pain in the ass and everyone involved hates doing them. The chargeback fees are supposed to be a disincentive to curb the behavior. It’s mostly automated now, but there’s a whole “accusation/response/appeal” process that businesses need to actively participate in or risk just getting money clawed back Everytime a chargeback happens, regardless of reason. This causes friction between merchants and payment processors that sometimes leads to one dropping the other. Being in a business where chargebacks happen a lot requires a commensurate amount of work. They suck. (Yes, I’ve worked in this realm. Even when it’s all automated and works well, it still sucks).