I submit that the Holocaust happened regardless of the outcome of the Nuremberg trials. Would you like to disagree and maintain your argument’s internal consistency?
So no, you did not notice how the person you’re defending was literally saying that there is no genocide going on in Gaza.
You followed my comment history here because you got upset that I didn’t accept “hilarious” as a rebuttal to my assertion that AIPAC openly bought two candidates.
In an entirely different thread. About an entirely different subject. In a different community.
You also got upset about downvotes on fucking lemmy and accused me of using sockpuppet accounts. Since you’ve looked at my comment history recently, does it look like the comment history of someone who uses sockpuppets to manipulate imaginary internet points that don’t even accrue, let alone matter?
What I see here is a Trump supporter getting bet out of shape that they got called out. And being a hypocrite about being called something they don’t feel is correct.
If you wanted to make it clear that you support genocide, you couldn’t make it much clearer than by coming to the defense of a genocide denier like you did here.
Genocide denial is disgusting and you should stop.
deleted by creator
I submit that the Holocaust happened regardless of the outcome of the Nuremberg trials. Would you like to disagree and maintain your argument’s internal consistency?
deleted by creator
So you’ll be denying two genocides, then? Ok. At least you’re consistent.
deleted by creator
No.
Also no.
I’d say I was glad to oblige, but I’m still talking to a genocide denier, so I’m not glad.
You literally just denied 2 claims of genocide.
That makes you a genocide denier, by your own logic.
Two false claims. Do you agree with Putin and Duke?
Netanyahu is committing genocide, regardless of how frequently you lie about it.
Weren’t you in another thread crying because you were being accused of something you claim not to be true?
You just can’t not hypocrite, can you?
No surprise that you’re standing up for a genocide denier.
Whatever you say, trumper.
I’m not a trumper. But the guy you just stood up for was plainly denying genocide.
Were you in such a hurry to spam my inbox with abuse that you didn’t even notice?
Whatever you say, trumper. I’ve seen your posts/comments here. You’re not fooling very many people- I hope you understand this.
And I’m not spamming your inbox, I’m responding to comments in a thread about a single topic. That’s how social media works.
I’ve seen how you act bud. You falsely accuse people of dumb shit so you can feel like a victim. Like trumpers do.
You’re not a victim.
Get over yourself.
So no, you did not notice how the person you’re defending was literally saying that there is no genocide going on in Gaza.
You followed my comment history here because you got upset that I didn’t accept “hilarious” as a rebuttal to my assertion that AIPAC openly bought two candidates.
In an entirely different thread. About an entirely different subject. In a different community.
You also got upset about downvotes on fucking lemmy and accused me of using sockpuppet accounts. Since you’ve looked at my comment history recently, does it look like the comment history of someone who uses sockpuppets to manipulate imaginary internet points that don’t even accrue, let alone matter?
What I see here is a Trump supporter getting bet out of shape that they got called out. And being a hypocrite about being called something they don’t feel is correct.
So I set things to correct.
You’re welcome.
If you wanted to make it clear that you support genocide, you couldn’t make it much clearer than by coming to the defense of a genocide denier like you did here.