• FiskFisk33@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    yeah, I understand the tech far better than I understand the law. I thought they legally counted as a contract, i guess they’re not even that.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      For a contract transferring property, you need 2 parties: One offering and the other accepting. Having knowledge of a cryptographic key implies none of that.

      You could get something like this done by transferring the asset to a reputable trustee. The trustee - a law firm, bank, or such - checks that the paperwork is in order and it has the necessary rights. It binds itself contractually to convey some benefit - eg a revocable copyright license - to whoever can show that they have a certain cryptographic key/control of a wallet.

      The firm should regularly check if the beneficiary still holds the key. It might get lost or forgotten, after all. The possibility of losing access to the asset by theft or accident is the only thing that involving NFTs add to such a scheme, so one might as well lean into it.

      • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Be a shame if I traded my stupid collection of URLs around and eventually bought them back only to lose the key, better get insurance in case I forget it.