A Florida man is facing 20 counts of obscenity for allegedly creating and distributing AI-generated child pornography, highlighting the danger and ubiquity of generative AI being used for nefarious reasons.

Phillip Michael McCorkle was arrested last week while he was working at a movie theater in Vero Beach, Florida, according to TV station CBS 12 News. A crew from the TV station captured the arrest, which made for dramatic video footage due to law enforcement leading away the uniform-wearing McCorkle from the theater in handcuffs.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It should be illegal for a number of reasons. One is a simple practical one: as the technology advances towards increasing levels of realism it’ll become impossible for law enforcement to determine what material is “regular” CSAM versus what material is “generated” CSAM.

      So, unless you’re looking to repeal all laws against possession of CSAM, you’ll have a difficult time crafting a cut-out for generated CSAM.

      And honestly, why bother? What’s the upside here? To have pedos get a more fulfilling wank to appease them and hope they won’t come after your kids for real? I really doubt the premise behind that one.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        And honestly, why bother? What’s the upside here?

        Allowing for victimless crimes simply because a group is undesirable is a terrible precedent. We can’t ban things just because they make us uncomfortable. Or because it makes law enforcements job easier.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Allowing for victimless crimes simply because a group is undesirable is a terrible precedent.

          I wouldn’t even call it victimless, and we have all kinds of actual victimless crimes that are already illegal so I don’t care about supposedly setting this “precedent” that has already been set a million times over.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            and we have all kinds of actual victimless crimes that are already illegal

            And we should be undoing those laws

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              We aren’t though, so it’s frankly pretty odd that you’re fixated on this one.

              It’s frankly pretty odd that Lemmy in general seems to be fairly pro-generated-CSAM. I’m betting you guys are just afraid of the feds finding your stashes.

              EDIT: I basically get maybe three replies a week to things I post on here, except when I post something about being okay with generated CSAM or deepfake porn being illegal (in which case I get binders full of creeps in my inbox).

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                There it is. “If you disagree with me you’re a pedo”. You people always go back to that. I bet I could convince you to hack off your own arm as long as I said anyone with a left arm is a pedo.

                • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I bet you’ve never convinced anyone of anything ever.

                  I’m not interested in going a hundred rounds with you on this. You haven’t made any convincing arguments at all; you’re making the type of shitty “anti-regulation” arguments that right libertarians have been making in bad faith in threads with me and others for decades.

                  And all to what end?

                  There’s nothing much to be gained by allowing this filth to be legal, and enforceability of important law to be lost.

                  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    There’s nothing much to be gained by allowing this filth to be legal

                    Bootlickers throughout history.

                    Rights are rights, and they should apply to everyone. Even the unsavory types.