• gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Ok, then what does it mean to you? Were you confused why Baldur’s Gate 3 was made too? It’s an even older gameplay concept and did less to change it.

    Edit: I’m also struggling to see how I was being “dishonest” by sharing an opinion.

    • Geosynchronous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Your argument is dishonest because you are completely misinterpreting what I’m saying - in plain English, you’re putting words in my mouth that I haven’t said. Then you’re attacking that made up concept instead of actually engaging in a discussion.

      Allow me to clarify:

      1. You’ve attacked “old” as me somehow implying that “new” is automatically better, which not only have I not said, but also don’t believe in

      2. With your Baldur’s Gate 3 comment you’re somehow implying that I think that ALL “old” titles are somehow bad, which is also not something I have said and also don’t believe in

      So to reiterate: I don’t think that new games are automatically better and I don’t think that old games are automatically worse. This is where your dishonesty stems from. I hope you actually understand that.

      Ok, then what does it mean to you?

      I have said this multiple times already but I guess I’ll say it again: it means Deadlock is not for me because I find it uninteresting. I guess I am just really disappointed that a company as revered as Valve could churn out something so bland.

      Bonus round:

      Were you confused why Baldur’s Gate 3 was made too?

      No.