• endofline@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I used protonmail for 3 years - bridge issues have been being ignored by protonmail support in my opinion. “Clean cache and try again”. I stopped using protonmail and switched to mailbox.org. So far so good.

    • sudneo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      From what I read though, the GPG security model for mailbox.org is the same as it is for Proton webmail (except for the browser plugin, where the difference is not really there). I like mailbox.org, to be clear, but I don’t get how it is an alternative to the bridge.

      • endofline@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I don’t use mailbox gpg sevice simple as that. I use mailbox perfect imap (k-9) / pop3 (desktop) integration and use gpg natively in case if that person uses gpg. Thunderbird (desktop), k-9 with openkeychain on android. I don’t say proton is bad. It’s quite good if you never want to export mails outside our webmail. I do want it so protonmail is not for me. Most my protonmail issues were with their bridge they, until the moment I migrated to mailbox, have not resolved.

        • sudneo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh that makes sense. Yeah, definitely simple encryption and exported (unencrypted) emails are not going to work together.

          I am all in support for European tech companies, so I think that mailbox.org, tuta, proton etc. Are all good options.