this video is not monetized this video is not about kris tyson this video is for educational purposes only this video features materials protected by the Fair Use guidelines of Section 107 of the Copyright Act. All rights reserved to the copyright owners. more to come.
    • sunzu@kbin.run
      355·
      2 months ago
      1. That’s a different person.
      2. I thought that was already debunked as alleged victim said they were not a victim?

      Edit: victim said it was not grooming but inappropriate conversations did happen. Hopefully we get them posted here. But either way that allegations against MrBeast’s staff have merit and should be checked out by law enforcement

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          11·
          2 months ago

          Thank you for clarifying.

          Do you know what the actual allegations are?

          • authorinthedark@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
            82·
            2 months ago

            hmmm I thought I did, I saw a little bit on Twitter talking about the video essays discussing the allegations. And then the tweet from the alleged victim saying that it was nothing, and then a tweet from someone who I thought was the creator of one of the video essays saying that the above alleged victim was not actually one of the victims they talked about.

            But now I can’t find any of that exchange, or even the original video essays, and all the news outlets are referencing just that tweet from the alleged victim and only seem to be referencing a single victim, but that might just be that the news outlets are trying to post things too early