I don’t get it.
Are you replying to “Except fun fact…no.” - u/Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Or to my reply to it, that implies, maybe their renderer is non-standard and causing the backslashes to not work.
I see, so the confusion is about whether u/Pyro@Programming.dev intended the double eyebrow or they made a mistake with that and are being corrected for it.
I thought they wanted the double eyebrow, because why would you put 2 if you only wanted one? And if you wanted the “quote” option, you would just not escape the leftmost “>”.
In case my above words are more confusing, Yes, it shows up as 2 sets of eyebrows for me too.
I thought that’s what the Thread Starter wanted.
Exactly! Couldn’t get it to work with the formatting :[
Let me try this.
I give up.
>>:|
Backslashes to the rescue!
Except fun fact…no.
Maybe your renderer?
Try this:
\> : |
That should come out as:
> : |
I don’t get it.
Are you replying to “Except fun fact…no.” - u/Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Or to my reply to it, that implies, maybe their renderer is non-standard and causing the backslashes to not work.
\>\>:|--> >>:| works pretty well for me.this is a whole mess of confusion and miscommunication that probably absolutely no one cares about, and I for one am happy to just watch
That shows up as two sets of eyebrows for me.
I see, so the confusion is about whether u/Pyro@Programming.dev intended the double eyebrow or they made a mistake with that and are being corrected for it.
I thought they wanted the double eyebrow, because why would you put 2 if you only wanted one? And if you wanted the “quote” option, you would just not escape the leftmost “>”.
In case my above words are more confusing, Yes, it shows up as 2 sets of eyebrows for me too.
I thought that’s what the Thread Starter wanted.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0