• Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago
      1. “Women, gays and blacks exist in a strata below white males because lobsters.”

      I cannot understand how you folks who love to defend this cretin can overlook this utter malarkey and focus on ‘make your bed’.

        • RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look at some of his old tweets. He’s racist and not as intelligent as he wants you to believe. It’s not complicated in this case.

          • Rocket@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Wait. He wants us to believe that he is intelligent? I’ve known toddlers that have an easier time getting words out.

            I thought his whole shtick was portraying himself a bumbling idiot to bring out the hyperemotional crazies who get worked up about people not being just so? It is always fun watching the hyperemotional crazies.

        • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe the lobster bollocks is actually Rule # 1. ‘Stand up straight’ or some shit (which lobsters also do not do because, well, they are lobsters).

          Have you read the book?

          • adeoxymus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have read the book yes, and the lobster stuff is in chapter 1 indeed.

            I don’t think that chapter was particularly enlightening, as far as I know it was mainly about how evolutionary selection results in hierarchies in al species (hence the lobsters), and standing up straight gets you higher in the hierarchy because of something something confidence.

            The evolution stuff is not wrong, and the stand up straight is… Eh… weird psychology stuff? However it didn’t mention women or gays as you said.

    • Kirkkh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s sanctimonious, hang in there cat poster stuff. I’d tell my brother to spend less time online if he shared this with me.

        • ExLisper@linux.community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it helps some kid clean themselves up, get a career, and get out on their own, and generally get their life together and pointed in a better direction, how is that a bad thing?

          A lot of sects can help you clean yourself up and get your life together. Is it a good thing if you’re being brainwashed into strange believes (like transphobia) at the same time? Maybe it still is but maybe there are better ways to help people.

            • ExLisper@linux.community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Have you read my comment? I’ve said that maybe it’s good but maybe you can teach those things in a better, less toxic and less sectarian way. I don’t have issue with his old teachings but I think following anyone blindly is stupid and with JP from the very beginning I’ve seen a lot of it.

                • ExLisper@linux.community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It looks like you believe I have some issue with you personally finding some value in Peterson’s writing. I don’t. You’re basically paraphrasing the same thing I’ve said. Can his writing help people? Yes, probably. Can you approach it in a healthy way, avoiding the toxic part and not becoming part of a cult? Yes, I’m sure it’s possible. Did most people approach it like this? Well, my sensation is that no, they did not. The community that grew around him became part of the right wing toxic masculinity and transphobic movements. And he never renounced it, it keeps playing a right wing guru. So yes, I don’t have any issue with people that read some of his books and found something valuable in them. But I also believe (and I think most people that are against him think the same) that he did more harm than good overall and that the world would be better without his philosophy. But of course it’s impossible to measure, it’s a subjective point of view and you can disagree.