• Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m surprised by some of the comments here. So much hatred for the teenagers but very little reflection on the responsibility of us as adults to create a world which is safe and understandable for young people. The real story here is not about the actions of the boys, it is about the actions of the people operating the websites they used, the big tech companies who created the tools and the governments (which we adults vote for) failing to properly regulate any of this. Generative AI is a disaster for young people and it was adults who created and unleashed it on them.

    • Michal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      We (adults) created a world with knives, guns, automobiles. But if any of these were used by a child for manslaughter would you still blame collective adults? No, parents are held responsible for protecting their children and controlling their access to dangerous tools.

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Bad argument. None of those things are easily accessible by, or even targeted at, teenagers. Generative AI is a technology that big tech is specifically building into the social media platforms and devices that young people use every day and there is no regulation or education to protect against the dangers it poses.

        • Michal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Knives and car keys are accessible. I don’t know about porn AI tools, i haven’t seen any myself. The AI tools i did see have guard rails that make improper use impossible.

      • mrpants@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah. Society is responsible for the outcomes of its children. It shouldn’t personally hurt your feelings but it should motivate your actions.

      • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m an adult and am not responsible for anything you described. They were all there even before I was born. In fact, the same may apply to my parents or even grandparents. I’d rather blame a sociopolitical class than any single generation for all those ills.

        But to answer your question, yes, I’d blame that entire class for the harm caused by young people using murder tools they introduced. They did it with the full knowledge of its consequences. They valued momentary material gains above the wellbeing of entire generations. They absolutely should be punished for all the mass shootings in schools, because they knew it could happen. Yet they chose the blood money. Similarly, if an entire city is under a drugs epidemic (like the current opioid crisis), wouldn’t you want to hunt down the producers and suppliers, instead of the users?

      • Umbrias@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean I would and do in fact literally blame societal and familial problems when kids are brutal, unkind, or hurt others, and similarly blame societal and familial problems for when kids are not protected from brutal, unkind, and hurtful things.

        Why are you saying the things you’re saying like a gotcha? Do you not feel that society has a significant impact on the behavior of youth?

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Since when could someone do this in Photoshop with a couple of clicks and zero training, for free and on any device? Since when has Adobe specifically marketed Photoshop as a tool for creating sexually explicit images?

          • Ilandar@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Since when has Adobe specifically marketed Photoshop as a tool for creating sexually explicit images?

              • Ilandar@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                4 months ago

                How is it a “strawman” when it relates specifically to the topic being discussed? A simple web search can bring up countless examples of generative AI tools that are designed to “undress” or “nudify” women. You seem to believe there is zero difference between using one of these sites and using Photoshop, so I am asking when Adobe marketed Photoshop as an undressing tool. The ease of use and access is the key difference here that you are trying to avoid acknowledging.

                • AwesomeLowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  My question was very simple and limited in scope:

                  Would the impact have been any different if they had used photoshop?

                  I did not make any sweeping comments, and I would appreciate if you stopped trying to claim things on my behalf.

                  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    They didn’t use Photoshop, they used generative AI. Maybe you should spend a little less time trying to save face and a little more time thinking about why that might have been.

    • Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I sometimes think AI is code for something of a normal computing capacity, but with the ability to decentralize and create a market of buzzword style shovelware pump and dumps.