• sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    why so much downvote…

    This is right, right thing to do and the motive called out is likely true…

    If you disagree, please state your reasoning.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Merrick Garland and his DOJ are absolutely not taking marching orders from the Whitehouse. Garland also doesn’t give two shits about politics. Dude’s rigidly ethical

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      You’re right, the President should basically do nothing in the year before an election. Everything must be accomplished in the first three years, then we take a break.

      Edit: (Assuming POTUS was even involved)

    • mad_asshatter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Lemmy dogpiles much more than reddit ever does. All one can do is upvote but it’s moot.

      Downvotes should max out at 5.

      eta:

      pud(proof)ding

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        Unenforceable wish: no limit on downvotes, but people should have to EXPLAIN them. I often learn more from opposing opinions than from statements of agreement. If I say something unpopular, I want to know WHY it’s so widely disliked. Maybe I’m unaware of something important.