• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh. knowing it’s a NK film, i wouldn’t find it strange seeing the NK’s as the good guys. it all depends on who the audience is. (or the censors,).

    and lets be honest, the accusations that we (the US) weaponize technology for global domination isn’t as far off as I might like. We’re not going to go invading NK anytime soon… at least, not without some incident to serve as “just” cause… but… we aren’t exactly the most peaceful of nations.

    • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are the exception, however, not the norm. Look at the huge kerfuffle that brewed up over The Battle at Lake Changjin, for example. It’s been derided as pure propaganda (unlike, say, almost any American war film!) that is full of historical inaccuracies (unlike, say, almost any American war film!) and that shows Chinese soldiers as unequivocally good (unlike what, say, almost any American war film does for American soldiers!) and that shows American soldiers as incompetent and/or evil (unlike what, say, almost any American war film does for whoever the enemy is!).

      Basically it’s the same old “othering” that dominates all public discourse anywhere. And it amuses the everloving fuck out of me.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh. It is. And there’s more people that recognize it for what it is. It’s also primarily entertaining. Nobody wants to be on the wrong side, so a film made for any given country is going to paint that country in a positive light.