I don’t think it. It’s true. The reason is because they were pushing his agenda. They’ve already admitted that. They removed it because he was getting too many. Just because you disagree doesn’t make me wrong because that is straight truth.
Second of all, wouldnt alphabet (googles parent company) back trump since he would lower their taxes and oppose législation that would cause them money?
The fact you don’t know this means you clearly just get info that is fed to you. You’re not worth talking to. Not my job to do your research. It’s there. You don’t want to find it.
Are you stupid? This isnt how you convince people youre right, how do you know you arent just consuming fringe misinformation. And also, the burden of proof is on the one who makes the claim, im going to assume you dont have a source
I talk truth in my own thoghts. You speak lies in talking points you were told to say. And you do. Be smarter. Don’t follow the herd.
I am glad to see that in his personal bankruptcy, Alex Jones has decided to spend the free time here on Lemmy…
Welcome to have you, Ale, I can’t wait to hear more about the chicken fried steak that God talked to you through.
Follower
I deserved you calling me a sheeple, Alex.
Alright, why do you think that google would remove dislikes becausr of biden
I don’t think it. It’s true. The reason is because they were pushing his agenda. They’ve already admitted that. They removed it because he was getting too many. Just because you disagree doesn’t make me wrong because that is straight truth.
First of all, source?
Second of all, wouldnt alphabet (googles parent company) back trump since he would lower their taxes and oppose législation that would cause them money?
The fact you don’t know this means you clearly just get info that is fed to you. You’re not worth talking to. Not my job to do your research. It’s there. You don’t want to find it.
Are you stupid? This isnt how you convince people youre right, how do you know you arent just consuming fringe misinformation. And also, the burden of proof is on the one who makes the claim, im going to assume you dont have a source