While other flatpak apps have no problems. Any suggestions?

    • SolarPunker@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      If it is due to an inefficiency of Firefox it seems strange to me that no fork has solved the problem, other browsers like Brave work perfectly.

      • Responsabilidade@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        Português
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        Not only because of performance issues, but also because it’s clunky sometimes. For example, I cannot use KeePassXC Browser extension on Flatpak Firefox cause this implementation is borked. However in native version works flawlessly

      • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Flatpak Firefox and Chromium are very different. Note that Flatpak Firefox starts normally fast for me.

        Use the native version, it is one of the best maintained software and has access to “user namespaces” for isolation.

        Now search on the internet what that is XD

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I noticed this too on my slowest machine. I guess you should just use native packages or other formats to fix it (as the other person said). I’d stick with Flatpak if possible though. It’s more secure

    • SolarPunker@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Anything else works fine, the only other problem I’ve noticed is that some GTK applications don’t respect the KDE Plasma theme (in my case only Quod Libet).

      • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        28 days ago

        Sorry for giving a rather useless advice. Of cause, you know about native packages, but since you are asking about flatpak, you, probably, have a reason to chose it. So, my original message was mostly intended as a joke, for which I am sorry.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          Just curious why you think it’s dumb. I think it’s a great idea, since it gives more protection by containerizing the app.

          Like I told OP, I haven’t had any particularly long load times, but “long” is a subjective measure, after all.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Probably best that you do the same (installing packages in the FS overlay kind of starts to defeat the point of containerization). You could try installing it with a distrobox and then exporting the app—see if that fixes your loading issues.

        I run Bazzite on a gaming laptop from 2015, and I haven’t noticed any particularly long load times. Do you have some browser extension(s) that are maybe causing issues?

        • SolarPunker@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 days ago

          My only extension is uBlock Origin but it isn’t the problem (I uninstalled it to test and nothing changed). Thanks for your suggestion, I’ll try to play with distrobox (I’m new to Bazzite and immutable distros).

          • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            Distrobox will introduce a startup lag of it’s own. I would rather recommend (seriously this time) something like nix (it is officially supported for your distro) or junest.

            • SolarPunker@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              28 days ago

              Oh thx for the info, I can maybe try with rpm-ostree in the case of lag. Nix is very good but I’m liking Bazzite very much for my needs, everything else seems working very good.

              • khorovodoved@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                28 days ago

                You don’t quite understand me, it seems. I do not mean nixos distro. Nix is already available inside Bazzite as an additional package manager.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            You can try rpm-ostree to install in the lowest userspace layer, but Bazzite purposely switched to flatpak Firefox and discourages installing software using rpm-ostree, unless you absolutely have to.

            • SolarPunker@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              28 days ago

              Oh I forgot about rpm-ostree ty! In this case of flatpak not working it is suggested rpm-ostree or distrobox?

  • Magister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    I’m so glad to use a distro with 0 flatpak/snap/whatever, my FF is always the latest one, with a simple .deb install from apt, ❤️ MX Linux