I’m using Arch Linux for 2 years. I subscribed to Arch’s mailing lists and I check my mails daily. I use flatpak instead of AUR.

I installed my system with archinstall and I update whenever I want. I didn’t have any issues yet and it’s the only distro that just works for me.

What about your experience? Any “breakage”?

  • Spudwart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe in a server environment it may be. But even in my home server setup, arch just works.

    I even took the easy way out with archinstall for both.

    I know that’s not very “I use arch btw” of me, but my server’s hardware literally died before my arch install did. And then I just dropped it into new hardware and it just worked.

    I’ve been running that server for 2 years, and my Desktop for less than 1 on raw arch. I used to use Manjaro but I switched to Arch because Manjaro’s packages were always annoyingly neglected. The amount of Times I had to circumvent Manjaro’s repositories to install the latest discord was rediculous. But even with Manjaro, my install never bricked.

    I’ve had Debian based installs like Ubuntu and Pop Os all brick before. Trying to do Qemu or edit some grub options and poof broken.

    Don’t know why, double, triple checked what the guide said.

    But it still broke. And I think that’s mostly because Unlike arch, most user friendly distros assume the user either isnt going to use these power user features or can just use online guides.

    Problem is online guides frequently go out of date.

    The arch wiki is always pretty consistently up to date enough not to cause issues. That random no-name website article is not.

    • wax@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use arch for services that does not have debian packages or docker images. AUR usually has a convenient PKGBUILD that keeps them up to date without me having to download a blob package manually