• greentreerainfire@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’d be like outlawing hammers because someone figured out they make a great murder weapon.

    Just because you can use a tool for crime, doesn’t mean that tool was designed/intended for crime.

    Not exactly. This would be more akin to a company that will 3D printer metal parts and assemble them for you. You use this service and have them create and assemble a gun for you. Then you use that weapon in a violent crime. Should the company have known better that you were having them create an illegal weapon on your behalf?

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The person who was charged was using Stable Diffusion to generate the images on their own computer, entirely with their own resources. So it’s akin to a company that sells 3D printers selling a printer to someone, who then uses it to build a gun.