Linus Torvalds has said that cryptocurrencies are simply "a great vehicle for scams"
  • Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, does not believe in cryptocurrencies, calling them a vehicle for scams and a Ponzi scheme.
  • Torvalds was once rumored to be Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, but he clarified it was a joke and denied owning a Bitcoin fortune.
  • Torvalds also dismissed the idea of technological singularity as a bedtime story for children, saying continuous exponential growth does not make sense.
  • Rustmilian@lemmy.worldEnglish
    291·
    5 months ago

    Linus hasn’t written kernel code in years at this point, however he still is the final gate keeper of what gets merged and an active code reviewer, he manages the entire direction of the project.

    As of what will happen when Linus passes, that’s already been decided. The position of projects leader will go to his most trusted project co-maintainer, which we have a good idea of who that is.

      • Rustmilian@lemmy.worldEnglish
        31·
        5 months ago

        There are a few candidates, the most prominent are probably :

        • Greg Kroah-Hartman: Played a pivotal role in stabilizing the memory management subsystem and enhancing block I/O performance, both critical areas for system stability and performance.
        • Sage Sharp (formally Sarah Sharp) : Instrumental in the development and maintenance of the networking subsystem and the ARM architecture code, ensuring compatibility and efficient networking for various ARM-based devices.
        • Git Junio Hamano: Maintainer of Git, the version control system that underpins Linux development. His leadership in maintaining Git ensures smooth collaboration and efficient code management for the vast kernel developer community.

        Greg Kroah-Hartman is speculated to be the most likely candidate, but it also depends on a few factors. Like, if Linus dies suddenly vs dying slowly or just stepping down, there’d be a big difference in selection process.

        Ofc, things may change in the future and there’s many other talented developers who can be considered. Nothing is set in stone.

        • Andrenikous@lemm.eeEnglish
          3·
          5 months ago

          Thanks for the details. With things heading more and more towards arm architecture I’m surprised Sarah Sharp isn’t the leading candidate. But this is all new to me so what do I know lol

          • Rustmilian@lemmy.worldEnglish
            3·
            5 months ago

            It’s not like they couldn’t be chosen, they have some serious stake in it. Consider their achievements and read the following :

            Here are some key qualities a potential successor should possess :

            • Deep understanding of the Linux kernel: Intimate knowledge of the kernel’s codebase, architecture, and development process is essential.
            • Proven leadership skills: The ability to effectively guide a large team of developers with diverse technical backgrounds and priorities.
            • Strong communication and collaboration: Excellent communication skills to bridge the gap between developers, and foster a collaborative development environment.
            • Technical merit and reputation: A well-established reputation within the Linux community for technical contributions and code quality.
            • Vision for the future: A clear vision for the future direction of the kernel, ensuring it remains relevant and innovative.

            I’d say they meet most if not all of them. All of the potential candidate’s are amazingly talented and determined individuals.

    • ÞlubbaÐubba@lemm.eeEnglish
      3·
      5 months ago

      He did rule that Rust can be included in the kernel code a bit ago, but IIRC that’s the last big thing he did with Linux as of late.