• Rangelus@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s my opinion that anyone who thought about upzoning logically for two minutes would come to the conclusion that it is necessary to substantially increase housing supply without also needing to substantially increase infrastructure. I’m glad to see the results are starting to be noticed.

    • Dave@lemmy.nzM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds like making decisions based on the good of all, instead of me in particular. Sounds like a slippery slope.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah increasing single family to 1-4 family isn’t going to affect the neighborhood fabric that much, especially if you consider that it’s literally just not banning slightly higher density structures

  • StrandedRez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The thing I dislike about high density housing is the lack of trees. Some thought needs to be put into this if it is the path we are going to travel

    • SamC@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, you need coordinated planning, e.g. careful zoning so that there are enough shops, public transport links, etc. in each neighbourhood.

      That said, this article is mostly about slightly increasing density to allow townhouses etc., which is still generally low density (not even medium density). Plenty of these places still have yards, gardens, even lawns. We’ve just traditionally built way way too low density. There’s no good argument not too increase our density to those minimal levels, given the problems we face in pretty much every city in NZ. Any opposition is basically pure nimby-ism.

    • cashew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The space for trees is where the road is. Reduce the lane width and curbside parking and you have plenty of space for greenery along the street. Just take a look at some streets in Amsterdam.

    • CryptoRoberto@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The beauty of high density housing is it takes up a lot less room and should leave land for green spaces. If we’re no all living in a suburban hellscape a hopefully more people are walking to shrink roads there’s more room for parks and trees.

    • themusicman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It shouldn’t be this way if done right. High density housing should make room for lots of parks and green space, green courtyards, etc.

  • David Palmer@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So glad to see our city planners being praised by Chuck’s outlet. I’ve followed Strong Towns for a few years now and they really are beating the drum for how we should build urban settlements in the future.

  • schzztl@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s strange to me how rare stories like this to the tone of “nz is doing good things actually” are in our national media outlets. Negative stories get more clicks I guess, but I wonder how that warps peoples’ perceptions.