The sickening irony of “theOSINTguy” talking about “one or two more genocides” when America has been complicit, has aided, and is abetting two genocides rn, with one JUST in the rear-view after Obama left office. You settlers are not slick.
I think you forgetting rule number 1 of genocides. Its not a genocide if you win the war. Winners write history. Not saying its right that’s just how it is.
According to them that’s not real communism as its never been tried properly. They are missing the fundamental problem that it can never be tried properly cos it can never be implemented successfully. But they don’t let that stop them.
Its called “English (traditional)” as opposed to the yanks who use “English (simplified)”. Remind me again what you Americans did to your native population? Three words pot kettle black.
Imagine assuming I’m part of the British minority who did the colonising and not the majority who got colonised and also learned proper English. I mean I’m neither so ur point is even more idiotic.
Nah I assumed you were an aussie from “munted” and the s you keep putting in colonizer; hence “convict settler”. Not like either one deserves enough respect to be demarcated distinct from one another, but that’s a whole different kettle of catfish.
Maybe one or two more genocides/famines and then they might relise.
The sickening irony of “theOSINTguy” talking about “one or two more genocides” when America has been complicit, has aided, and is abetting two genocides rn, with one JUST in the rear-view after Obama left office. You settlers are not slick.
I think you forgetting rule number 1 of genocides. Its not a genocide if you win the war. Winners write history. Not saying its right that’s just how it is.
Meanwhile, in Israel…
According to them that’s not real communism as its never been tried properly. They are missing the fundamental problem that it can never be tried properly cos it can never be implemented successfully. But they don’t let that stop them.
You sound like a convict settler
What does that even mean? Are u calling me a coloniser? A convict? Both? Please explain ur idiotic logic.
Considering you spelled “colonizer” with an ‘s’, you are really not doing yourself any favors
Its called “English (traditional)” as opposed to the yanks who use “English (simplified)”. Remind me again what you Americans did to your native population? Three words pot kettle black.
“what […] Americans did to [their] native population” you mean continuing the genocide that the British colonists enthusiastically started?
and wow promoting that unhinged naming scheme for US/UK English, really another incredible echelon of coloniser-brain
Neither I or my ancestors are colonisers my hands are as clean as yours.
Imagine asking a Black guy what crackers did to the natives. Exactly what they
didare still doing to us, peckerwood.Imagine assuming I’m part of the British minority who did the colonising and not the majority who got colonised and also learned proper English. I mean I’m neither so ur point is even more idiotic.
Nah I assumed you were an aussie from “munted” and the s you keep putting in colonizer; hence “convict settler”. Not like either one deserves enough respect to be demarcated distinct from one another, but that’s a whole different kettle of catfish.