• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you’re having trouble understanding what this map means, it means that the suicide rate for men is higher than for women everywhere, notably 5 to 6 times higher in Eastern Europe and Russia, and 8 times higher in a couple of Central American countries and West Africa.

    I wonder what makes men the world over decide that suicide is the best option.

    • Lmaydev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I would imagine toxic masculinity.

      Men are encouraged to be stoic and not express their emotions.

      Most men don’t have a single friend they can talk openly about their emotions with.

      • Moneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s interesting how terms like toxic masculinity lead to instant downvotes from a certain type of person but if you make the exact same comment without it you get zero downvotes.

        It’s almost like people have been conditioned to be reflexively averse to specific words without actually understanding what they mean.

        • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Toxic masculinity was a term coined by men wanting to be free from the expectations of the patriarchy. It’s beyond heart breaking that so many men parodoxically react with anger to this phrase. Double so while bemoaning the lack of mental health options for men.

          My good dudes, you’re literally building the cages for yourself.

    • pyrflie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hierarchy, military conflict, and expected economic outlook. All three are pretty bleak in the worst regions shown. External powers have the first, the countries in question are engaged in the later, and the next 20-50 years are pretty bleak for typical male occupations for the countries in question. I would expect Argentina to rise over the next few years, but who knows women may kill themselves at a higher rate under a fascist govt.

    • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Men are overly hormonal. Domestic abuse, war, homicide… They should take a more logical stance instead of being a slave to their feelings.

      • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re saying that men should sever their feelings? How is that even possible? What do you feel like is the right way to do that?

        • Sidyctism@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Its a joke. The point is that women are often being told that they are too emotional (as opposed to the very logical men), even though men are often the ones with violent outbursts.

        • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          No my friend, but assuming that feelings, emotions, and hormones are something negative that need to be ignored or done away with is an artefact of patriarchy and we can throw that whole shit away.

        • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Lol it isn’t sarcasm. If you would like to test my hypothesis, next time you see a man raging, tell him he is being overly hormonal. 99% chance he will not calm down and start behaving logically XD

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wonder what makes men the world over decide that suicide is the best option.

      Because if you don’t have a partner and high paying job, you aren’t just worthless, you are a burden.

      • Montagge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m going to need proof

        It just seems like some of y’all want a self fulfilling prophecy.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wonder if evolution isn’t at play. Females killing themselves off is an awful reproductive strategy. Males doing the same is not such a big deal.

      If I’m not clear: A woman takes about a year from attempting to get pregnant to gestation to birth to recovery. I could impregnate hundreds of women in a year. And so could any other man. We’re simply not as valuable.

      And yes, men have plenty of value outside sperm donation, I was trying to shine a harsh light.

  • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I have no way to know the lived experience of women, but I have observed since about 4 years of age that the buck stops with me. I, and I suspect the vast majority of men, have no backstop - If I have any problem that I can’t fix myself, or can’t pay money to get assistance with, I am fucked.

    I hear anecdotally that women are more likely to tell people about suicidal ideation… Does this imply that women have better results using social networks to move past the stressors or illness behind that ideation?

    Best case if I was feeling like I couldn’t bear to keep living and told someone, maybe a family member would have me committed for my own good. Then after the imprisonment, I am also unemployed and still have no one with the bandwidth to help me deal with whatever issues I was having.

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Afaik suicide attempt rates are 2-3x more common in women than men. Men are just more likely to choose methods that are more deadly.

      • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not to belittle it on either side but I do wonder what causes that disparity. Is it that men plan it more thoroughly or have access to more dangerous methods? Do women choose methods that, unintentional or not, can be backed out of more easily? Are women more likely to report a failed attempt than men? If that 2-3x factor is true, then why don’t we see similar numbers of idk completion? I hesitate to say success because it is very much not a success to commit suicide, there are always other options, even if they’re not perfect.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’ve heard the claims that women generally opt for less effective methods because they’re more likely to want to leave an opportunity to back out, or try to avoid leaving a messy corpse. I have not data here, these are simply claims I’ve heard.

          • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’ve heard the latter, as in even in death women are thinking about others.

            Anecdotally, I’ve heard that almost universally. Every woman or girl I know who has chosen not to commit suicide, someone having to find their corpse factored highly in their reasons.

            • clearleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Someone being there to find them in the first place might be a factor in all this.

  • peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m a man, USA. In my personal experience, which doesn’t mean very much, I’ve noticed that men seem unable to accept catastrophy. They try to reason or wiggle a way out of it. Woman seem more at ease when dealing with horrible events.

    If I had to guess, it is a difference in perception and experience. Perhaps men are groomed to be “providers, problem solvers,” and so they despair at unsolvable problems, while women are told not to “overreact,” and to “support” others in times of crisis. Like a weird inverted effect of patriarchal society.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Men are groomed to hide feelings. We are often told from very young age don’t be a sissy. Suck it up. Be a man. From young age you are thought that showing emotion makes you less of a man, makes you a sub-human. But we all have issues, pent up emotions and problems. Then one day you simply stop wanting things. Or pain becomes too much.

    • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I didn’t know about that community, but I also don’t see why I shouldn’t post here? The beauty of the Fediverse is that there can be many places that serve the same purpose.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why? The red and orange are close in color, otherwise it shows if it is green in color, more women commit suicide than men, then the ratio goes up by color

      • tweeks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        If it is green then they have the same average right? 1:1. But in this graph it would be difficult to show when more women committed suicide, which might nowhere be the case.

        Or you’d get 0.5 with a color match, for example.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      See now, when I say lemmy users are the dumbest bunch of people I’ve ever seen outside of YouTube comments, people say I’m being too harsh. But this comment is currently at +45.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        it is not a matter of intelligence to want to understand an info graphic without need to put work in it

          • shneancy@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            it’s probably foolish to get into an argument with someone who thinks themselves better than me, but i’m bored so

            in what world, do you read the word “ratio” then see “7” and instantly go “ah yes, 7/1 can also be seen as 7:1”, instead of being confused for a bit because you expected a ratio

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              It…specifically explains the part that you were confused about. Right there, below the title.

              • shneancy@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                you literally have to additionally imagine the rest of the ratio anyway. I know dividing 7 by 1 gives you 7, but just a 7 is not a ratio

                i give up, you either think yourself better than everyone to the point of refusing to acknowledge how the info graphic presents its information in an unintuitive way, or are OPs alt dying on this hill trying to defend your info graphic

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I know dividing 7 by 1 gives you 7, but just a 7 is not a ratio

                  Does this prevent you in any way from comprehending the image? It takes more effort to parse out what you just said than it takes to understand the drawing. I still don’t understand why it’s relevant but that’s beyond the point.

                  The image title could have said “MALE SUICIDES VS FEMALE SUICIDES (SKABADOO BANANAS WITH PAUL LEMON)” and you should still be able to immediately understand that farther right = more male suicides

                  Hell you should be able to understand the gist of the image without even having any numbers on the bottom, just “less” on the left and “more” on the right.