• Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most motorists? Why is it only people who enjoy motoring that get a say in this? What about the rest of us?

    I don’t drive and I want them to crack down on those loud as feck vehicles, especially the dirt bike races they have regularly.

    Loud as feckin hell.

    • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Car brain headline / premise. Of course only the opinion of motorists is actually valid, you poor jaywalking peasant!

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the point is to show that even amongst their peers, people who love loud pipes are a minority that the majority would gladly see being stopped.

      I agree now but I once was young and had a loud pipe on my truck and on my motorcycle (always with a catalytic converter though!), I think it’s just a natural phase in the car person’s evolution… Then you’ve got a bunch of Harley riders and Dodge Ram drivers that never grow past that phase…

  • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Intentionally loud exhausts are obnoxious and selfish. As much as I dislike it, however, I’d far rather deal with the noise than having yet more surveillance. We’re already the #3 most surveilled country in the world, only the USA and China is worse.

    • Swarfega@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Harley Davidson bikes are just noise pollution. Unlike cars they are build like this out of the factory.

      • kenbw2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea to me it’s not the volume of the engine/exhaust. It’s that it’s intentionally obnoxious

      • wopazoo [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No they aren’t. Harleys are quiet with the factory exhaust, it’s just that they are commonly modified with aftermarket (louder) exhausts.

    • LUHG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      We may be number 3 but we must be number 1 in terms of % of people monitored by some form of camera. The USA road network is nowhere near as heavily monitored as the UK.

      Driving through France, Belgium and the Netherlands was very free compared to the UK.

      • burningmatches@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        A taxi driver in Singapore once told me that they hold this title, ahead of the UK. He then pointed out the cameras on almost every lamp post.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Electrics cars will make it a non issue but then we will be stuck with the surveillance. Our country is scary. No one cares.

      Having said that if you are intentionally being noisy for noisy sake there should be harder punishments. Even lose your license for a bit, it’s not a got given right to drive. You got to earn it.

      All drivers should be considerate of others

      • activistPnk@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Electrics cars will make it a non issue

        I do not see EVs replacing scooters (which are driven by lower budget commuters). A single unmuffled scooter driving through #Paris at 3am can wake up 10,000 people according to Bruitparif. And don’t forget horns. Assholes will used their horns at 3am on my street. The only thing they give a fuck about is their own convenience when their favorite parking spot is taken.

        The idea of harsh punishments works if a vehicle is continuously loud because it will eventually cross paths with a cop. So that position is fair enough. But what about horns? There’s never a cop around when horns are misused.

          • activistPnk@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I think not. But then I’m not living in a wealthy part of town. I think I’ve only seen one, ridden by a colleague. It only takes one of those little 2-stroke 50cc gas fuckers to wake up 10,000 people.

    • activistPnk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’d far rather deal with the noise than having yet more surveillance.

      My cognitive dissonance triggers on this point because one of the reasons I cycle is privacy. I am also firmly in the #fuckCars camp (noise, pollution, death, selfishness of people putting their convenience above lives of other people & animals). It’s hard to give a shit about car drivers having privacy. And also realize that car drivers inherently sign up to give up privacy in order to use a personal car anyway (registration, insurance, banking transactions tied to those activities and their fuel purchases, etc). The fuel purchases of car drivers feed the oil industry, which in the US feeds the war chests of republican candidates who disrespect both privacy and the environment.

      Yet people making the wise pro-privacy considerate decision to cycle are still exposed to breath car fumes, noise, and life-threatening physics (e=mc²).

      Hard to have sympathy for car drivers. Although my dissonance needle moves a bit more if these noise cams are always recording video and thus capturing all people not in cars. I don’t know if that’s the case.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      yes, and here you have an opportunity for that overwatch to benefit your daily lives. Accepting it everywhere else but bitching about it here seems pretty self defeating.

      • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it wasn’t obvious, I don’t accept it everywhere else, I think the state surveillance apparatus should be completely dismantled.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you protest the ubiquitous surveillance a bunch?

          Often?

          Ever?

          Yeah. Never. You’ve never once gone out on the real ones taking the piss out of you every fucking day. Never.

          But this has you up in arms.

          To put things succinctly, I’m not convinced mate.

          • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have no idea why you’re making assumptions about me with literally no context. I’m heavily involved with activism locally, but it’s more in the area of direct action rather than protest, because protest is a waste of time.

            Anyways, I haven’t been involved in anti-surveillance action, because it would be illegal to damage CCTV cameras, to cover them with paint, or to glue plastic bags over them. Lasers can be dangerous and people shouldn’t buy high powered ones from China. Fortunately lasers aren’t really good at permanently damaging cameras, but it’s still hazardous to use them to blind CCTV cameras, especially while disabling them with another method, because someone might get hurt or you could cause damage to the cameras.

    • sosodev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure if this a joke. Noise cameras are a real thing. They use an array of microphones to show which parts of an image are emitting sound and at what level.

    • theplanlessman@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read it as being a riff off of “speed” cameras, which are obviously cameras triggered by speed and not cameras that capture the concept of speed on film.

  • duncan@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    I live in a city center, and frequently have loud cars drive past. Some are substantially worse than others. The loudest of them are so loud that when they go past I can’t hear my TV for 30 seconds or so, and that’s with my windows all closed and listening via headphones.

    Something really does need to be done to enforce the noise laws that are often being ignored.

  • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never even considered that was an option. I figured loud jackasses was just something we’d have to live with.

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m on the fence. Daft custom exhaust on a 1.5 turbo 3cyl is stupid, but there’s no way I can agree to more surveillance.

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.ukM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I guess it depends what your comfort level for surveillance is.
      In this case, it would likely be “camera activated at 96dBA, numberplate in view was BO55 MAN, NIP being sent to keepers address”

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would be brilliant if it was this isolated. But it seems like every step in surveillance always leads to more surveillance. It’s always some innocent excuse, without ever drawing the full picture together with preexisting stuff.

        There’s now a generarion that has grown up without ever having experienced not being watched.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m on the fence with your statement because it kinda describes WRC cars and they’re FUCKING AWESOME

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In general I wouldn’t mind people having the freedom to make their cars impossible to sit any reasonable amount of time inside, but I don’t currently have a suggestion on how to make certain peeps be not assholes in residential areas.

        In regards to WRC - isn’t that world rally championship? I don’t think I’ve ever seen one happening anywhere near apartment buildings on single lane streets with cars parked on both sides and kids’ playground nearby.

    • jscummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m an American who stumbled here by accident but do you guys have many cars/bikes that are noisy out of the factory? The guys running Civics with a pineapple shooter look like assholes but I kind of get it if you’ve got a big V8 that just sounds like that

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing really sounds loud out of the factory. It’s always the peashooters with custom exhaust.

  • AKADAP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some idiot is going to hang out near the camera with a boom box and play loud engine noises every time an electric vehicle drives by.

  • bloopernova@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    (Apologies for USA centric comment)

    I think if that was proposed in the USA, people’s heads might actually explode. When 2 roundabouts were put in nearby, some people acted like the UN new world order was on its way. I grew up in Basingstoke so I love roundabouts. Thankfully people have come around to the idea.

    I’d support it just so my dog can walk near a road without some pickup gunning its engine as it flies past us. Any kind of traffic speed reduction is treated with fury over here.

    People with loud pipes don’t realize they look like a nobend and sound like this: https://youtube.com/shorts/s0xqopmjbSo?feature=share

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll take the loud cars if we can get some real fucking regulations on headlight brightness so I don’t get blinded every time I drive at night.

    • theplanlessman@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is already the regulation in the Highway Code:

      114: “You MUST NOT use any lights in a way which would dazzle or cause discomfort to other road users”

      The “MUST NOT” indicates that this is a legal requirement and so it is a criminal offense to disobey it. Now if we could get the police to actually ENFORCE the legal requirements in the Highway Code, then maybe things might improve on the roads.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean if that’s the case then they have to enforce it on the companies as well because in 2023 it’s the default on many models on the road, not even with their brights or high beams on.

        • theplanlessman@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just went down the legislation.gov rabbit hole, and it seems there are regulations on headlight height and angle that have been in place since 1989, but unfortunately no maximum power or brightness restrictions.

          Which means that although a driver could be fined for using excessively bright headlights, the manufacturer of the car could not be fined for making the car like that in the first place.

          Perhaps if things like these noise cameras gain in popularity it will encourage the lawmakers to look at other issues like this one.

    • DJDarren@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I drive a Mini. The SUV infiltration in this country is making night driving a miserable experience for me.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I kind of miss the days when most people around here drove a small car, now everyone’s in a tank.

  • sammer510 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not really in favor of surveillance but it should be legal and socially acceptable to throw rocks at cars that have been straight piped. Fuck em. If you make your car louder on purpose you should be punished

  • Alchemy@lemmy.team
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its motorbikes round my way that are stupidly loud. Not even kidding you can hear some of them a mile away. I know this because I can see the road about a mile away and still hear them!

    • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. And in recent years the amount of drivers are pushing their luck more. Like driving clearly illegal bikes, driving on grass parks and footpaths and even through underpasses. I saw three teenagers break into a bike shed to stash their stolen scooter in. The Police didn’t seem to care much even though I called with a crime in progress. Nothing like this happened where I live a few years prior.

      • Alchemy@lemmy.team
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well theres no deterrent these days.

        Another one is those electric scooters, they’re a real menace!

        • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah for sure. I honestly think electric scooters and electric bikes are the way forward (not wasting energy on 1-2 tonnes of metal while going round town). But until they are better regulated and enforced it’s just mayhem.

        • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I saw a couple of cops stop a guy on a moped who was running a red light yesterday and I wanted to applaud. Mopeds and electric bikes (especially if they’re driven by food delivery people) run lights, go the wrong way on one-way streets, go on the sidewalk… And they’re not just doing this on empty streets. They usually stay out of the way of cars (being hit by a car hurts, I suppose) but they’re happy to cut off pedestrians. Heh, I think I haven’t seen them driving indoors yet but it’s only a matter of time since they’re almost never stopped.

          • Alchemy@lemmy.team
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve had a fair few near misses with electric scooters both walking and driving. The main problem is kids who sadly have no road sense and don’t appreciate the dangers.

    • Treczoks@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      With motorbikes there is the additional problem that most of their owners actually rework them to be louder. I can regularly hear the motorbikes on the bypass, which is about the same distance, with a hill in between. You don’t hear the busy car traffic, but you hear the motorbikes.

      • Oderus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        and the difference is personal opinion. We had anti-noise bylaw removed because of 2 factors, the limit was too high for most people (96DB) and because it’s really difficult and expensive to monitor. They need special noise detectors and they don’t have lots of them so they only used them in areas where most people complain and it resulted in zero change while increasing costs.

        My motorcycle is loud. Louder than any stock car but it’s far from 96DB yet it’s also quieter than a lawn mower, or a weed whacker, or a plane so what do you about those noises?

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s an easy fix. Vehicles are whatever volume they are from the factory. Then just ban modifying them in any way to become louder.

          An absolute decibel limit doesn’t need to exist. You’re just not allowed to deliberately increase the volume of your vehicle above what it’s natural level is.

          • flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Amen. Steel legal shouldn’t include performance enhancements - get a track car and go at it where there’s a suitable environment!

          • Oderus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If there was an easy fix, they would have done it. Loud is subjective so you need to set a baseline and you need decibel numbers for that.

            Just banning modifying exhausts is short-sighted because think of all the companies out there making custom exhausts that aren’t super loud.

            You’re applying kid logic to an adult problem.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Loudness is not subjective. You can use a cheap device called the phone in your pocket to measure decibel readings come up with a baseline for every car and if it’s louder than that baseline then it’s not allowed. Also it’ll be pretty obvious if it’s too loud because the person driving the car will be a chav

            • MidgePhoto@photog.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              @Oderus @echodot
              Sound intensity is objective.
              A loud shirt might be subjective.

              I’ll grant you that a noise which is unacceptably loud at dead of night in a residential area might be acceptable once a week at Cape Canaveral.

              But that’s situational, not subjective.

  • DJDarren@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve taken to muttering “There goes the Vroom Vroom Man in his vroom vroom” every time one of these pricks rumbles by. It solves nothing, but makes me laugh.

  • Leviathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want headlight cameras to clamp down on idiots blinding other drivers with their brighter-than-the-Sun headlights.