Hi everyone,

I would like to ask your opinions on reliable cloud storage providers for media. I have a media collection that isn’t too big (about 2-3TB) that I’d like to store on the cloud since I’ll be moving in the future and don’t think I can handle multiple hard drives.

What do you suggest? Any issues I should be looking at? I came across Wasabi too, along with the more expensive Scaleway and Cloudflare R2 offerings. For now Backblaze seems fine in terms of reliability, but has anyone come across complaints from them regarding what is stored on their servers?

Thanks!

  • Chef_Boyargee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve got about 12 TB in Amazon Glacier. Granted, I’m using this as an offsite backup for my NAS, rather than regularly accessed for consumption.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        But isn’t that the point? You pay a low fee for inconvenient access to storage in the hope you never need it. If you have a drive failure you’d likely want to restore it all. In which case the bulk restore isn’t terrible in pricing and the other option is, losing your data.

        I guess the question of whether this is a service for you is how often you expect a NAS (that likely has redundancy) to fail, be stolen, destroyed etc. I would expect it to be less often than once every 5 years. If the price to store 12TB for 5 years and then restore 12TB after 5 years is less than the storage on other providers, then that’s a win, right? The bigger thing to consider is whether you’re happy to wait for the data to become available. But for a backup of data you want back and can wait for it’s probably still good value. Using the 12TB example.

        Backblaze, simple cost. $6x12 = $72/month which over a 5-year period would be $4320. Depending on whether upload was fast enough to incur some fees on the number of operations during backup and restore might push that up a bit. But not by any noticeable amount, I think.

        For amazon glacier I priced up (I think correctly, their pricing is overly complicated) two modes. Flexible access and deep archive. The latter is probably suitable for a NAS backup. Although of course you can only really add to it, and not easily remove/adjust files. So over time, your total stored would likely exceed the amount you actually want to keep. Some complex “diff” techniques could probably be utilised here to minimise this waste.

        Deep archive
        12288 put requests @ $0.05 = $614.40
        Storage 12288GB per month = $12.17 x 60 = $729.91
        12288 get requests @ $0.0004 = $4.92
        12288GB retrieval @ $0.0025 / GB x 12288 = $30.72 (if bulk possible)
        12288GB retrieval @ $0.02 / GB x 12288 = $245.76 (if bulk not possible)

        Total: $1379.95 / $1594.99

        Flexible
        12288 put requests @ $0.03 = $368.64
        Storage 12288GB per month = $44.24 x 60 = $2654.21
        12288 get requests @ $0.0004 = $4.92
        12288GB retrieval @ $0.01 / GB x 12288 = $122.88

        Total: $3150.65

        In my mind, if you just want to push large files you’re storing on a high capacity NAS somewhere they can be restored on some rainy day sometime in the future, deep archive can work for you. I do wonder though, if they’re storing this stuff offline on tape or something similar, how they bring back all your data at once. But, that seems to me to be their problem and not the user’s.

        Do let me know if I got any of the above wrong. This is just based on the tables on the S3 pricing site.

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not sure, this wasn’t clear to me from their pricing page. There were 4 stars next to that item but the explanation for that didn’t elaborate on bulk retrieve.

            I assumed there was some minimum number of operations, or it had to be the entire backup restored to count as bulk.

            • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              Without egress fees, glacier pricing is amazing. But I need to talk to someone who has actually restored from glacier to be able to consider it.

      • Big P@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I use it as a last resort backup for things that are worth the recall price if I lose them

      • Chef_Boyargee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Definitely not the cheapest option. I should probably look at migrating somewhere else one of these days. At least it was easy to set up for my Synology NAS.