• jagungal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        They have their pros and cons. I wore a uniform to a public school (Australia) and it definitely meant that I had one less thing to worry about every day: being judged by what I wore. As an adolescent that meant a lot, and getting the freedom to wear whatever as an adult has meant that:

        1. I got to learn what’s appropriate before I got that freedom and

        2. I had the maturity to not care what others thought about how I dressed.

        • Jolan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I went to a British school and it may have helped against being judged for what you wore but instead people just judge you on everything else like your haircut or the way you speak or the way you act etc. If people want to judge you they will snd what you’re wearing won’t stop that. Not to add people from poorer backgrounds will have broken/ripped/dirty uniform so it does not help at all.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I went to a school uniform school (uk). It had its pros and cons but having 5 polo shirts, 2 sweaters, 3 pairs of black trousers (pants), a pair of shoes and a backpack wasn’t the craziest ask for a decade of schooling.

    • Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      School uniforms promote a more classless society. In retrospect I definitely would have favored them. Of course they should be unisex.

      • HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Only when the kids’ parents can afford the uniforms, which has historically been used to divide the poor from the middle and upper classes.

          • GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            “What is a speed suit? Only the perfect habilitant for the science minded man, who knows both comfort and ease and demands them from his clothing. In a speed suit you say to the world: ‘Look out! I know what I’m wearing for the rest of my life!'” — Dr. Venture

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If uniforms are absolutely necessary make everyone where the same thing. Pants and shorts for all.

  • SaintWacko@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    What I think is absurd, at least around here, is that schools are allowed to require that students wear a specific uniform, but they’re not allowed to require that students have a coat

    • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Forcing kids to bring coats is weird to me

      Maybe it’s different elsewhere, but I was born into a relatively cold+wet climate and moved to San Diego in elementary school. I didn’t bring a coat because it made me hot, I was acclimated to colder weather, and I didn’t want to carry it around.

      They refused to let me go outside for recess for weeks because I didn’t bring a coat and refused to wear one from the lost and found. Finally, one day, they sent me to the principal’s office and called my mom in for a chat to discuss my misbehaving.

      My mom’s response was, “You called me in from work for THIS?! If he’s not cold, he’s not cold! He has warm clothing at home. He’s capable of deciding whether or not he would be more comfortable with a jacket on. Let him go outside and leave me alone”

      • SaintWacko@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        See, that makes sense, but the problem here is when it’s cold, they don’t let the kids go outside at all because some of them may not have coats

        • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sounds like they should let the kids choose whether they want to you outside or stay in based on whether or not they feel cold

  • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    Clearly, the ability to be outside in appropriate clothing for activities isn’t being mandated. This is where a temperate climate enables ridiculous practices to persist.

    All I can think about when I see this image is how in Ontario, the responsible provincial ministry requires all schools and ‘day nurseries’ (read day and after school care) to put the kids out in the yards twice a day unless the weather conditions are severe (Less than -20 or more than +30 Celsius.).

    Parents are responsible to send their kids with suitable clothing for the cold. One rarely sees little girls in skirts in schools unless they are wearing tunic dresses over leggings.

    In an earlier era, pre 1970s, when skirts were mandatory for girls, that meant switching to pants or snow pants from the skirts 3 times a day to go outside in winter (two breaks and leaving end of day).

  • Funwayguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Either this article is poorly researched, the study is scuffed, or both. It isn’t the uniform but the type of which that the school enforces. There are plenty of schools with gender neutral uniform policies, heck the one I went to in Aus had 3 options, one of which is sports specific for all genders.

    • Wilshire@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The last paragraph

      Sarah Hannafin, the head of policy at the school leaders’ union NAHT, said: “Physical activity, PE and sport are an important part of the school day and curriculum for pupils. Schools do much to help ensure all pupils are healthy and physically active and break down barriers to participation, including among girls – and this includes considering the uniform choices available for children.”

  • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    But but… They need them uniforms! They definitely need to be taught that their identity doesn’t matter from a young age. How else would we get a society that obeys authority?

    Clothes are inherently classful. Kids should not have to worry about class and what others think of what they wear and whatnot. Therefore, it’s totally a good idea to rip away this freedom! In fact, I have an even better idea! Let’s make all citizens of the country wear “citizen uniforms”! That way, there would be no class. No one would have to worry about what they would have to wear to work today if that choice didn’t exist in the first place! Such a bright idea, no?

    It is totally not draconian to tell others what to wear on their body (unless they wear clothing that can cause legitimate harm). Right? RIGHT?

    /s

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Basic standards and not having abject consumerism everywhere.

        People wear they bloody pajamas to go to the store now.

          • Wanderer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            9 months ago

            Lack of self respect and thought for others. No one wants to see you in your pajamas.

            • rigatti@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Oh my god, pajamas! How obscene. Won’t someone think of the children who are forced to see a human fully covered in baggy cloth?!

            • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Lmao this is definitely not the view where I’m from. I see people in their pajamas in public constantly. I’ll have conversations with strangers about pajamas. People in my area don’t really give a fuck what others think and want to be comfortable while they go through the hell that is life. I don’t have the time or energy to make sure I look great before going to the store. Idk anyone who does tbh.

            • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Other than being cut a little more loosely and generally being softer and more comfy, what’s the difference between regular clothing and pajamas? Why does wearing something you find comfortable mean you lack self respect? Seems the opposite to me. Being comfortable means you respect yourself more.

        • 800XL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          What if you get tired while shopping and need a quick nap? Sleeping in a full set of vestments is so uncomfortable

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m pretty sure the dudes who are making this a requirement just believe the skirts are for easy access to their physical activity. 😡