• CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we all just pretend Red Hat and its derivatives/relatives no longer exist? It’s clear that the leadership behind these projects don’t care about open source anymore. There are plenty of options for Linux operating systems that actually care about user freedom, privacy, and openness. Anything with Red Hat backing it no longer gets to claim they support any of these.

    Install Debian, install Arch. If you must, install Ubuntu (though they’re not much better these days). Anything but Red Hat.

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      RHEL is the core IT/SysAdmin crowd. Anyone looking to get into this career space gets a copy of The Linux Bible and runs Fedora to get started. A lot of the Linux core functionality comes from, and is maintained by RH. This is not just a desktop choice for users. If you really want to get to a kernel hacking type of understanding of Linux RHEL documentation is a great baseline where there is info that does not exist in any other source except reading the source code.

    • anonymous_bot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lets say I wanted a distro with more bleeding edge packages but not something DIY like Arch, what would you recommend?

      • RainRaining@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nowadays I use EndeavourOS. It’s Arch bit “just works” Graphical installer, you choose a DE, it automatically installs audio, media codecs etc. But under the hood it’s still Arch so you get daily updates and AUR

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use Calam Arch Installer which is a graphical installer not unlike those used on other distros but for vanilla Arch. Garuda and Manjaro use the same installer but with their tweaks. Calam installer is standard Arch.

      • Paralda@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        CachyOS. It’s arch based, but the installer is really good, and it has great repos. It also has a lot of optimizations for modern cpus

      • Falmarri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t really can arch diy. I run arch. I have way fewer problems with it than any other distro

    • haroldstork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t you think that’s a bit extreme? I don’t think that the community debating opt-out telemetry qualifies fedora as not supporting open source. Correct me if I’m wrong, but Fedora is a community run project, meaning basically all of it has to be open source.

      • curve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s so much dumb fud spread about fedora and RHEL anymore it’s not worth the time arguing about it.

        • haroldstork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am also very tired of debating it too. It seems like these people are more content with being angry about it than understanding the move and disagreeing with it

        • KingKRool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s exhausting, and shit like this is truly one of the most toxic aspects of the FOSS community.

      • d3Xt3r@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        SuSE needs a better package manager. Zypper was cool back in the day, but no longer cuts it, especially when you compare it to the likes of dnf5.

    • Presi300@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You cannot say that the derivatives of RHEL don’t support foss, as all of them are community made/maintained. Also TECHNICALLY speaking RedHat did not breach the GPL, as it allows for selling of foss projects… Not saying that it’s not a dick move, just saying that it’s TECHNICALLY legal…

    • Aggravationstation@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea, OK. I was a Red Hat apologist and kept using Fedora for a while but after this sadly I think it’s time to go back to Debian. Thank God I didn’t install Fedora on my new server which I was going to set up next weekend.

  • simple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    But for real though, they had to know that having telemetry be on by default wasn’t going to look good for the open source community.

    • DishonestBirb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially with Red Hat’s current shenanigans that just recently happened. I can’t see how anyone thought this was a good idea OR good timing for it.

      • Erik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s too harsh imho (the power corrupts thing). Telemetry can be very useful (see how Mozilla lately solved a bug in Firefox related to a specific version of the Linux kernel) so I’m willing to believe their intentions were right. But I agree it’s not a smart move and better to have made it opt-in taking the target audience of the distro into account.

    • KingKRool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      They haven’t made anything. It’s just a proposal right now. Instead of constructively sharing feedback about the default state, people are spouting hyperbole like “Red Hat is Windows”.

      • itsJoelleScott@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah, thank you for explaining. I don’t follow Linux news as closely as I should, and I wondered if this affects me because I use Fedora.

  • moonsnotreal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly I don’t care about the proposal. If it’s just a checkbox to untick on install then it’s not much different from what apps like vlc do.