“No one is looking at us or the extent of this disaster or the crimes that we are experiencing in Gaza,” he said. Still holding his microphone, he slid off his flak jacket marked with the word PRESS and unstrapped his helmet.

“These protection jackets and helmets don’t protect us,” he said, flinging the equipment to the ground. “Nothing protects journalists. … We lose our lives for no reason.”

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is heartbreaking, I don’t know what else to say. The justification that these casualties are acceptable because “Hamas is there too” is just nonsense. If that’s the case why won’t Israel let civilians cross the border into Israel to prevent their murder?

    • ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doubt Hamas was at this reporter’s house, which was singled out by Israel for an airstrike, which they then pretended to know nothing about.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re probably right, I’m just trying to get ahead of their typical excuse for collateral damage

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not even collateral damage is it? It’s the damage they intend to inflict, killing journalists who dare to show the world what Israel is doing.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not just journalists, kill the journalist AND his entire family by waiting until he gets home and then bombing his house.

            Hamas look like angels compared to israel

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Hamas look like angels compared to Israel.

              Idk if I’d go that far. Hamas is at least honest about it, though. They don’t try to hide the fact that they want every Jew dead. Israel will continue to genocide Palestinians while denying that the whole time.

            • floofloof@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree with the first part, not so much with the second. They’re both pretty nasty.

      • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just playing devil’s advocate, maybe it was hamas who bombed the house just to get sympathy. Hamas has shown that they don’t really care much about civilian casualties.

        • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When you bomb 4000 children and have a “odd” recurring record of journalists dying as “collateral damage” then maybe the advocacy work could be put to better use elsewhere. Nobody has sympathy for Hamas here.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nuke the whole world, hamas is on the planet. Killing all humans is the only way to be sure.

    • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wanna preface this with “Israel is clearly in the wrong for these attacks and civilians casualties are not an acceptable consequence of this conflict” but as others have already mentions: Israel not taking in Palestinians is very clearly because you can’t reliably filter out hamas from Palestinian civilians. That doesn’t make what their doing OK, it’s just the very obvious reason for them not doing what you’re suggesting. It doesn’t help that these continues attacks probably makes the civilians population more likely to want to retaliate against the government. “You make the monsters you want to fight” and a that.

      • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The denial of basic necessities for human survival and the driving of civilians southward is a coordinated push to expel the populous from the Gaza Strip. They’ve attempted back channel deals to scrub Egypt’s debt for them to take in the civilians. Their “plan” to ship the expelled around the world has been leaked. People understand this, and thus, the only logical solution is for Israel to take care of these people whose lives they are shattering. They can’t leave their land or Israeli land or they won’t get it back. Whether it’s worth dying over is largely out of the Palestinians in Gaza hands for the moment.

        This can’t be made someone else’s problem, because that’s exactly what Israel wants and that should make their motivations very clear.

        • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you actually suggesting Israel take over Palestine and absorb the civilians populations. That’s insane. Theirs decades of hate and anguish here, Israel would need to keep the Palestinians isolated from the Israeli population for fear of retaliation and the Palestinians would live under constant observation for fear of retaliating. Israel can’t deradicalise Palestine when their a good chunk of the reason Palestinians are radicalised into hamas. The only sensible solution is egypt taking over the region and promising diplomatic responses to Israel instead of continued conflict but they don’t for the same reason: because they don’t want the radical element of hamas under their governance. In the end the only end I see is Palestinians expelling hamas or Israel wiping them out because the alternative is continued conflict forever (which i suppose is also possible, it’s been that way for years after all).

          • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not my suggestion, it very much appears to be what they are doing in Gaza. Removing their right to self determination is also not a solution. The UN is a much better force to act as interim peacekeepers. I don’t think either of us are probably going to be the ones to crack the peace nut. All that I am saying is that secondary evidence and leaks point to a future where the people of Gaza have been removed and I very much believe Israels intent is to never let them back in.

            • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              Their not taking over so much as pushing out. Taking over would be more like sending ground forces to find and eradicate all known hamas agents and then establishing an interim Israeli government in the region. The end goal here is very clearly not to take in the Palestinians as new citizens to israels government, its to damage as much of hamas as they can and put a large buffer zone between themselves to minimise the likelihood of retaliation. It’s not a takeover when you appear more than willing to wipe out whoevers already their. And I don’t see any situation where if Israel does take over they actually let Palestinians continue living there.

      • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Palestinians is very clearly because you can’t reliably filter out hamas from Palestinian civilians.

        This is also a fucking BS, sure you disapprove but you can’t even put that on the table. Right now, Israel is fabricating more than ever the so called “terrorists”, that’s why they conflate the term with resistance fighter. Don’t you fucking think it is a traumatic situation?! Bombing, displacing, cut water/electricity/food …

        At the very very least, it should have been a terrestrial attack, but they are so coward and reluctant to anything not jewish (last bit is in their book), that they go freestyle and free of consequence.

        • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean you can’t filter out anyone whose been radicalised from those just wanting an out. And the possible risk from mistaking it is extremely high.

          • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Holy molly I feel dirty, suddenly. , I misread your comment, my bad. The BS argument is about “radicalization” , of course. People seeing their relatives, friends and weak (children) getting killed is just fuel for outrage and punishment…

    • V17@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that’s the case why won’t Israel let civilians cross the border into Israel to prevent their murder?

      Whether you agree with Israeli attacks or not, obviously the answer to this is because it’s impossible to filter out Hamas terrorists, which is the main thing they’re trying to prevent.

        • V17@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your right, best to kill them all then.

          Where did you get that?

          What do you agree with btw?

          I’m not happy with what Israel is doing. But I don’t know of a better way to get rid of Hamas either. And I’m convinced that if we want a free Palestine and a working two state solution, freeing it from Hamas has to be the first step without which no sustainable situation with Israel can ever be achieved.

          • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m sure this will work about as well as the US attempt to get rid of the Taliban. Or as well as any of the other instances in the past of trying to get rid of an ideological group through violence.

            It doesn’t work. It makes everything worse. It radicalizes survivors and kills lots of innocent people.

            Some day maybe humanity will collectively abandon these cycles of hatred and violence played out over decades. But I doubt it.

            • V17@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              You have a point, but it’s not really the same thing and there’s a very good recent counter-example too. ISIS was effectively dealt with despite being spread out over a much larger area. Taliban won, but it had a whole huge country to work in and was nowhere near as violent as Hamas, so it had more support. Gaza is tiny in comparison, blocked on all sides and neighbors of Israel don’t want anything to do with them either, even if they don’t like Israel. There is also at least some alternative in Fatah, which didn’t lose the 2005 elections by that much.

              Imo it’s clearly possible to get rid of Hamas, though I’m not making any claims about the probability that it will happen.

              Mostly, I don’t really see an alternative. Some radical action needed to be taken because anything else would be interpreted as a clear proof that large terrorist attacks against civilians work, and Hamas should continue committing them. You cannot appease someone whose reason for existence is violence. And keeping Hamas sort of in check, only killing or capturing the worst terrorists, which is what was being done in the last two decades, clearly did not work either.

              • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You don’t see any alternative to the slaying of people in a 10 to 1 ratio in what is an offensive reprisal attack? I mean Machiavelli would agree with you.

              • medgremlin@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why does “radical action” always mean “radical violence”?

                “Radical action” can and should include radical kindness in which past wounds can be forgiven and a cooperative future can be built. Right now, all the violence is doing is ensuring that Hamas will be enumerated and maintained for generations by the people that Israel is considering to be sub-human and disposable. Radical violence creates radical ideologues and only ever begets further violence in the absence of total and absolute annihilation.

                • V17@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Radical kindness will specifically tell Hamas “yes, brutal terrorist attacks work, keep doing them”. That is unfortunately not an option. It’s also just a fantasy because it would understandably never be supported by Israeli population for this reason.

                  I’m interested in seeing alternative solutions that could actually work and be realistically implemented, but outside of understandable positions like “ease off with the fucking bombing and do more work on the ground” that don’t change the goal of what is being done I have not seen any.

          • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I should have put an /s there I guess. You don’t know a better way than genocide? If the treatment kills the host then it is not in fact a cure.

            • V17@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              If Israel wanted to kill all people in Gaza, they could just carpet bomb them without ever stepping a foot in. The only reason to do a ground invasion that will inevitably bring a ton of Israeli casualties is to reduce civilian deaths.

            • 5BC2E7@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You seem to be implying that israelis are not people or that their lives are less valuable.

              Edit: you should look the definition of imply in the dictionary. responding that you didn’t say something you implied is not a valid argument.

              • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                where did I say that? Must be hard juggling a victim complex with 4000 murdered children. Oh, maybe not?

                edit: K, where did I ever come close to implying any civilian life (that’s universal jackass) is less worthy or valuable. What a fucking coward, coming in and editing the original as a way to skip a response. Here’s one in return piss pants.

              • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re implying that Israel is entitled to murder thousands of civilians, half of them children, and level to the ground a city that used to house over a million people up until recently, just because its far right government that has protected people who abused Palestinians for decades doesn’t want to seek any solution other than relentless violence. One day you’ll look at yourself in the mirror and find yourself a monster.

          • quindraco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Better way is easy: a one state solution like Israel claims it wants would be better than this. Declare everyone in Palestine an Israeli citizen, move in law enforcement in force, and arrest murderers for murder.

            • V17@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree that it would be better for the Palestinians, clearly Israeli Arabs have better lives than people in Gaza and West Bank despite also facing some discrimination, but Gazans would never agree to this (that is clear from public opinion polls done by PA institutions - for example over 70% of people in Gaza support violence against Israeli civilians), so the end result would be exactly the same is this one. You would still have an army of violent murderers hiding in tunnels with almost two decades of preparation for exactly this.

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, you believe Israel can identify a Hamas terrorist remotely to bomb them, but can’t identify Hamas terrorists when they are at the border in person?

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        My dude has never seen a customs office or checkpoint in his life

        No its obviously because Israel doesn’t care about Palestinians lol. They wouldn’t have literally any of these issues if they hadn’t been doing like 80 years worth of state sponsored occupation and murder.

        You really think the people in Gaza chose to willingly leave their former homes and land to move into a military enclave?

        • V17@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are extremely naive if you think that a military checkpoint would solve this problem. Egypt was not able to stop Hamas terrorists and their supplies going back and forth through the Rafah border crossing to commit acts of terror in the Sinai peninsula for example. And that was during “business as usual”, not in a situation where potentially hundreds of thousands of people would likely have to go through.

          • mlg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bold of you to assume Egypt isn’t complicit in letting that happen lol.

            Their military literally runs on bribery. So much so that there’s a local conspiracy there that Egypt provided Israel with all the intel during the 6 day war because they had no intention of fighting and negotiated to get Gaza off their hands in exchange for never having to worry about Israel again.

            Again though, my point is that Hamas as an entity wouldn’t exist if Palestinians were considered regular citizens and not forced off from their own property.

            • V17@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Again though, my point is that Hamas as an entity wouldn’t exist if Palestinians were considered regular citizens and not forced off from their own property.

              This may be true and it would be good to consider this when deciding what to do after Hamas is gone, but it doesn’t change anything about current situation. The fact is that thinking a military checkpoint would filter out terrorists is incredibly naive, and whether Israel cares about the lives of civilians or not likely wouldn’t change this particular issue at all.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Either they’re armed and easy to identify or they’re not at which point there’s one less person to worry about shooting Israeli soldiers while their tunnel network is dismantled. I don’t see the problem.

        • V17@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you honestly not see the problem with letting out at the very least tens of thousands of people, possibly hundreds of thousands, and guarding them all well enough so that none of them can do any hostilities that can be done without smuggling arms out of Gaza (whether it’s sabotage, inciting violent protests to keep the IDF occupied or terrorist acts using weapons smuggled into Israel from elsewhere)?

          • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’d be hard sure. Still better than bombing the spots they directed people to and killing droves of civilians.

        • bookmeat@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, now you have two more people inspired to shoot Israeli soldiers and civilians. It’s like you don’t even understand how people’s minds actually work.

          • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And Israel’s current strategy isn’t carrying water for Hamas recruitment right now?

            • Instigate@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Israel’s strategy over the last 70 years created Hamas and has ensured that it has continued to hold power in Gaza. I don’t know what that other commenter is thinking, but I think characterising Israel’s strategy as carrying water for Hamas recruitment is a strong understatement. They’re not just carrying water; they’re pumping it from the ground, putting it in containers, divvying it up, and carrying it as far as they’ll go. Hamas exists because of Israel, much as how Al Qaeda and ISIS exist(ed) because of the US (and allied forces) and Russia.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why does Israel not let people leave and use its famed intelligence services to identify who the Hamas fighters are? It is looking like the Israeli government simply prefers collective punishment or even genocide.

    • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you know who is Hamas and who is a civilian? It’s not like Hamas honorably sticks to identifiable uniforms in this war they started

      • cogman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re right, so let’s just declare everyone in Gaza Hamas and bomb everyone. Right? Isn’t that Israel’s current policy?

        Hey, why don’t we speed things up and nuke the area. Wouldn’t that be more efficient?

        Killing civilian children is not an appropriate response to terrorism.

        • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          And what, according to you, is the best response Israel could make to an unending string of terrorism?

          • cogman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            What unending string of terrorism? Before Oct 7, when was the last Israeli killed or injured by Hamas?

            But to answer your question, the best response is securing the boarder and asking yourself “what could be the motivation for these attacks?”. It’s to try and seek/broker peace.

            I’d suggest reading up on the IRA and the good Friday agreement to see how a government can end an unending string of terrorism. A relentless show of force is how the US created ISIS. That’s what Israel is doing right now.

          • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            Apparently letting in the terrorists. They took the usa Democrat course in securing borders

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they filter through the border they can’t be armed. It’d be pretty easy to take away all their arms if no one was left to guard their tunnels.

      • SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s really obvious:

        • in a tunnel underground? terrorist

        • shooting Israeli’s? terrorist

        • not getting the fuck out of an active war zone and pretending to be a civilian? terrorist

        • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Should all of Ukraine abandon their land because Russia declared their land an active war zone?
          If someone invades your country do you not have the right to fight back? You’re basically saying, leave or die. How does this logic not apply to the attacks of oct. 7th? Not defending said attacks, just pointing out how utterly brainless your statement is. It also sounds like approval of genocide.

    • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why would you let people who may or may not be criminals / terrorists into your country ? What do you think this is the usa southern border ?

      Would you let random people come flooding into your house ?

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The US southern border is so scary. Migrant workers enter the US every day, it’s terrible. These people are going to ruin America by looking for better lives for themselves and their families. /s

        I’ve lived very close to the US/Mexico border most of my life. There aren’t any criminals and terrorists coming to live here. It’s all just people looking for better lives. The criminals smuggle drugs and people over, but they don’t move over here too often, and even if they do, it’s just to sell drugs. There are no terrorists amongst them, idk where you got that idea.

        Don’t fall for right wing propaganda about the US/Mexico border.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    At 8:30 p.m. Thursday, after signing off from a live report on Gaza’s soaring death toll, Abu Hatab headed to his nearby home in Khan Younis where he lived with his wife, six children, brother and brother’s family, his colleagues said.

    On his way, he spoke to the Palestine TV bureau chief, Rafat Tidra.

    “He was so professional, as always,” Tidra said. “In that conversation, he was focused on what he was going to report the next day, how we were going to work.”

    At around 9:30, an Israeli airstrike hit his house, wiping out the Abu Hatab family. No one survived. His neighbor’s houses only sustained limited damage from the blast.

    So was there a Hamas base under this journalist’s private residence or something?!

  • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s easy to take an enlightened centerist approach here saying things like “both sides do awful things” and “everyone should stop”. And while to a point that this is true, there has a history of revenge repesials going back devades. But that really ignores the vast power imblance between Israel and the strip.

    From basic utilities to free movement on roads to kicking Palestinians out of their homes in favor of Israeli settlers. It’s a small easy thing to relax in your chair and say everyone is wrong, but this conflict can end when Isreal stops their oppression. Not providing clean water and bombing medical infrastructure is genocide all by itself. Gaza is an open air prison where movement is restricted. It’s high minded arrogant nonsense to say Gaza should focus on their own country when Isreal is literally bombing their water wells.

    • elouboub@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both sides do awful things. Everyone should stop.

      But let’s be honest here, the area didn’t belong to the zionists for a really long time. The international community forced Palestinians off of their land and for a good 70 years Palestinians they have suffered. Zionists should not have been given the means to invade the Palestinians.

    • rdri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      this conflict can end when Isreal stops their oppression

      It can end when hamas surrenders.

      Not providing clean water and bombing medical infrastructure is genocide all by itself.

      It wasn’t a problem before October 7th. Maybe hamas should’ve done something about preventing such a situation, to build water purification facilities etc. Also maybe not build war infrastructure under medical infrastructure.

      It’s high minded arrogant nonsense to say Gaza should focus on their own country when Isreal is literally bombing their water wells.

      It’s low minded arrogant nonsense to say that Israel should not react to attacks of terrorists who vowed to not stop attacks until they destroy Israel with it’s 9 million population.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whoa israel just directly bombed his house with his whole family inside because he was press. What the fuck.

    israel is saying they will kill you AND your entire family of you report on their war crimes.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    So now Israel targets Hamas AND the press? The latter just feels so wrong.

    This comment is now a downvote farm.

  • dumdum666@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, the situation in Gaza is awful and a tragedy in every way imaginable. It is a war zone.

    • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your right, Israel should cease it’s indiscriminate violence now and call for an immediate stabilization of the civilian population on the ground. That was a big leap for you man. Proud of you Dobby!

        • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hamas doesn’t care if those civilians and journalists die anymore than probably Israel does. It goes to show how stupid this is because everyday Israel becomes more the murderer, more the oppressor, more the aggressor, more the monster. I’m sure Hamas leadership love it because they literally have to do nothing as proud Israel marches into the history books as the land hungry maniac butcher of the middle east. This is how a 9/11 works and you buffoons are out here trying to roast Hamas marshmallows on the smoldering corpses of women and children.

          • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            The trick is, if you destroy enough Palestinians and drive them from thier home ling enough, those people’s kids will have no connection to Palestine/Gaza and little desire to go back. After time the situation would solve itself.

            If you continue to let hamas rule Gaza and commit acts of terror then Israel will retaliate insuring the continuation of the current situation until.the end of time.

              • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                1 year ago

                Or you know, the people.in Gaza can leave and not die. Not only.do they not have to die from Israel bombs but don’t have to live under hamas rule

                Sounds like a win win

                • Why9@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  What a sickening take.

                  Not only.do they not have to die from Israel bombs

                  It’s THEIR LAND. Why are the only options “leave forever, or die?”.

                  but don’t have to live under hamas rule

                  There wouldn’t be a Hamas if Israel didn’t stop murdering and stealing land they have no right to. Between 2008 and 2020, 5,590 Palestinians have been murdered

                  Until Israel has all of the land, this won’t stop. They continue to murder and maim for decades, and when a Hamas retaliation happens, well then “this is war”.

                  Let’s be clear about something. This was ‘Christmas come early’ for Israel, as Hamas laid out an attack that gave them a cart blanche to go all out on Palestine, ignoring all wartime rules, as they commit actual genocide, confirmed by Israeli Holocaust scholars: https://www.wrmea.org/israel-palestine/holocaust-scholars-say-israel-is-committing-genocide.html

                  The solution should always start with de-escalation. Everyone knows this. Cops are trained to do this. Why is nobody policing Israel? They can’t even commit to saying what is going on in Israel is definitively Genocide.

                • ek1t6ufv@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yet neither Egypt nor Israel want to open their borders to Palestinian civilians. Where should they go?

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            44
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sounds like it was a bad idea for the Gazans to put them in charge of their government. Maybe they should do something about that

            • medgremlin@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They took power illegally years before the literal majority of Gaza citizens were even born.

              Edit: My apologies, the ones that are almost legal adults would have been infants or toddlers at the time Hamas seized power. They really should have done something about that while they were learning how to walk and speak. /s

              • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                1 year ago

                Okay, and? I’m sorry, my dude, but Hamas won the election before they illegally seized power, and it’s not like the people of Gaza have tried to do anything about that. Who is supposed to do it for them?

                Yeah, it sucks that sometimes the citizens of a nation pay the price for the actions of their leaders. But who else can change their leaders for them?

                • medgremlin@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re talking about a population with extremely limited resources that is literally 50% (or more) children that has been under two fascist boots for the last decade and a half. There does come a point where a level of desperation combined with a possibility of a better future will instigate a revolution, but right now? They don’t see a possibility of a better future. With Israel’s Likud on the other side of the wall and no resources to rebuild after a coup, what’s the point in gambling everything on maybe being able to overthrow the more local oppression?

                  Also, education in Gaza is very inconsistent and most political revolutions are started by people with education and nothing to lose.

              • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                1 year ago

                If North Korea starts a war, its people will bear the brunt. But that’s a bad comparison - Hamas was elected.

                • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Maybe tell that to the children (who are 2 out of every 5 murdered) who didn’t even exist for this definitive election of yours. It’s a fine comparison. It’s been so long since either event that your blaming a currently suffering group for the mistakes of it’s predecessors, and it rings just as gross and hollow. Why don’t you tell me how women should dress so they don’t get raped?

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lots of people should do lots of things to make the world better. I feel they’re not going to, though.

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah. Hamas is the only group which can really end this, though. Israel ending it involves a lot of dead people. They’re not going to stop until Hamas cannot make war any longer, and I can’t blame them.

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah. Hamas is the only group which can really end this, though. Israel ending it involves a lot of dead people. They’re not going to stop until Hamas cannot make war any longer, and I can’t blame them.

            • TinyPizza@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The world and history will blame them. Nobody, not a single soul, is concerned with where you cast the blame.

  • SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    if your protection gear isnt working, get better gear. if that isnt possible, it may be time to rethink your life decisions.

    • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you’ll struggle to find protective gear that will protect you from a direct airstrike

    • fosho@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      with the amount of garbage takes I’ve seen from you, I would hope the irony isn’t completely lost. try taking your own pathetic advice.