kalkulat@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months ago95% of Companies See ‘Zero Return’ on $30 Billion Generative AI Spend, MIT Report Findsthedailyadda.comexternal-linkmessage-square208linkfedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1external-link95% of Companies See ‘Zero Return’ on $30 Billion Generative AI Spend, MIT Report Findsthedailyadda.comkalkulat@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square208linkfedilink
minus-squareFenderStratocaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down1·3 months agoYeah, this is ChatGPT 4. It’s scary how good it is on generative responses, but like it said. It’s not to be trusted.
minus-squareBrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·3 months agoThis feels like such a double head fake. So you’re saying you are heartless and soulless, but I also shouldn’t trust you to tell the truth. 😵💫
minus-squareFenderStratocaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 months agoEverything I say is true. The last statement I said is false.
minus-squaresqgl@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 months agoI think it was just summarising the article, not giving an “opinion”.
minus-squareBrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoThe reply was a much more biased take than the article itself. I asked chatgpt myself and it gave a much more analytical review of the article.
minus-squaregrrgyle@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoIt’s got a lot of stolen data to source and sell back to us.
Yeah, this is ChatGPT 4. It’s scary how good it is on generative responses, but like it said. It’s not to be trusted.
This feels like such a double head fake. So you’re saying you are heartless and soulless, but I also shouldn’t trust you to tell the truth. 😵💫
Everything I say is true. The last statement I said is false.
I think it was just summarising the article, not giving an “opinion”.
The reply was a much more biased take than the article itself. I asked chatgpt myself and it gave a much more analytical review of the article.
It’s got a lot of stolen data to source and sell back to us.