Deepfake celebrities begin shilling products on social media, causing alarm::Hanks and other celebrities have recently become targets of AI-powered ad scams.

  • serial_crusher@lemmy.basedcount.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess if you’re stupid enough to buy a dental plan based on Tom Hanks’s recommendation, you’re also dumb enough to think Tom Hanks still looks that young.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of them or all of them? Because if it isn’t all of them, they deserve those protections.

          I don’t know… that argument seems to me like saying because some poor people are Republicans and vote against it, they don’t deserve universal healthcare.

          Protections should be universal.

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Feels like a symptom of poor education to me.

          Society in general seems to give up quickly on people who might need extra support to learn, without really considering the consequences

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point is these people are already being scammed, regardless of if it’s the real Tom Hanks.

  • Doctor xNo@r.nf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Been going on for years already,… They only noticed this now? 😅

  • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who buy stuff just because a celebrity tells them make me lose hope in humanity. And I’m not talking about deepfakes, which are bad for their own reasons. But I find the fact that people buy a product just because there’s a famous face next to it rather stupid.

  • Wooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Digital advertisement platforms need significantly harder ad regulation. We do it for other mediums, digital should be more regulated considering the reach and revenue.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did anyone ever think that celebrities that appeared in advertisements actually used or liked the products they are paid to promote?

    This seems like false outrage.

    • Dellyjonut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the issue is more that people think something is legitimate, and when they go to purchase it or something they get their identity stolen

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The celebrities may pay lip service to that, but really they’re concerned about unlicensed use of their image.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The next day, CBS anchor Gayle King warned of a similar scheme using her likeness to sell a weight-loss product.

    Also on Monday, YouTube celebrity MrBeast posted on social media network X about a similar scam that features a modified video of him with manipulated speech and lip movements promoting a fraudulent iPhone 15 giveaway.

    As we’ve warned, convincing AI deepfakes are an increasingly pressing issue that may undermine shared trust and threaten the reliability of communications technologies by casting doubt on someone’s identity.

    Currently, companies like Google and OpenAI have plans to watermark AI-generated content and add metadata to track provenance.

    Meanwhile, social media networks will likely need to step up moderation efforts, reacting quickly when suspicious content is flagged by users.

    Almost a year later, with technology advancing rapidly, a small taste of that chaos is arguably descending upon us, and our advice could just as easily be applied to video and photos.


    The original article contains 585 words, the summary contains 155 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    These celebrities should be making $60,000 to $150,000 like the rest of us anyways. What the hell do they produce

    • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many actors make that, or much less. The big names put asses in seats though. No one is paying money to watch my loser brother in law pretending to be stranded on an island yelling at volleyballs.

      • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They would. But still doesn’t justify the pay. Many people come together to make films and actors are the least hard working of all of them. They exploited the system just like these AI systems are. Its not something I have sympathy for and if they replace actors with computer generated models and the profession goes back to just a regular job, I feel like we haven’t lost anything