Fuck you, Newsome. I think pay for striking workers would be overwhelmingly popular with voters. I’m voting against this turkey next chance I get.

  • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    In rejecting the bill, Newsom noted that the state’s unemployment trust fund is already nearing $20 billion in debt.

    “Now is not the time to increase costs or incur this sizable debt,” he wrote in a message explaining his veto.

    Yup makes sense. The title could mention this at all. Knew there had to be some reason, because it’s stupid to do that with him posturing for president in the next run. I’d rather him have vetoed it and said if you want this passed then it needs to include further funding for the unemployment fund.

  • artisanrox@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly tho, this is why unions have dues and memberships, rainy day funds and their own officers and treasury.

    Unions are more than just '“walking out”.

  • halfempty@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m honestly surprised that Newsom did this veto. What a slap in the face to his constituent base!

    • wahming@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why? The other comments list a bunch of perfectly good reasons for this veto