The Forbidding Unlawful Representation of Roleplaying in Education, or FURRIES, Act, filed by Austin-area Republican State Rep. Stan Gerdes, would “prohibit any non-human behavior by a student, including presenting himself or herself, on days other than exempt days, as anything other than a human being.”

The law would allow for exempt days, such as Halloween and other school dress-up days.

The law defines “non-human” behavior as “any type of behavior or accessory displayed by a student in a school district other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species,” with provided examples being:

Using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine or other human byproducts

A personal or outward display, except during a school play or by a school mascot, through surgical or superficial means of features that are non-human such as using tails, leashes, collars or other accessories designed for pets

Using fur, other than naturally occurring human hair or a wig made to look like human hair

Artificial, animal-like ears

Other physiological features that have not historically been assigned to the human race through a means of natural biological development

Students who bark, meow, hiss or make other animal noises that are not human speech

Licking oneself or others for the purpose of grooming or maintenance.

  • -☆-@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    A grown ass man had to write this for the express purpose of stopping kids from playing at school.

    Stan Gerdes what the fuck is wrong with you dude? Who hurt you?

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think we’re running into a phase where Republicans are proposing laws based on shared boomer facebook posts and the like rather then actual concrete issues.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        They’re not small enough to fit in womens’ size pants, but they sure are trying to fit in women’s pants to personally check for the absence of male anatomy.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Uh, what? That sentence is borderline unreadable.

            I’m being hyperbolic when I say that the Republican Party wants to personally check what’s in women’s pants, but the reality is that they’re disturbingly fucking focused on ensuring trans women can’t be in women’s bathrooms or women’s sports. Nobody with a modicum of decency would try to predicate bathroom usage based on the absence or presence of a penis, yet they’re constantly trying to present and push through legislation to do just that.

              • pivot_root@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Whatever the hell you’re smoking, it must be something good. I’m criticizing the Republican Party, not defending them.

                Or, if I’m misunderstanding and you’re actually calling me a Nazi for thinking trans people should not be subjected to gential inspection, then you’re in desperate need of a mirror.

  • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That means these are illegal now too:

    girl wearing a bejeweled car ear headband.

    As well as goths/punks wearing collars. Both of these are things I did in high school, and I’m not a furry. This is so dumb.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    3 days ago

    If enacted, I’m guessing the main effect of this would be to make “meow” the new standard greeting among a large fraction of the student population in Texas high schools.

  • theluckyone@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 days ago

    The party of small government and personal freedoms.

    Obviously, they were talking about their personal freedom to dictate the freedom of everyone else.

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    3 days ago

    Using a litter box for the passing of stool, urine or other human byproducts

    They put that in the law because they want people to think it actually happens.

    It reminds me of the time that a proposed bill outlawed “critical race theory” in schools, which it defined (in part) as teaching that present-day white people must feel guilty about past slavery. But nobody had ever taught that.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m PROUD that they CUT my Child’s Lunch and Teacher’s salary so they could focus on THIS!

  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lots of students with verbal communication issues about to be illegal. As are students with artifical limbs or organs or even glucose monitors. Also who gets to decide this: “other than behaviors or accessories typically displayed by a member of the homo sapiens species”?

    • supernight52@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s vague, specifically so they can invoke it against any child they consider part of the “out group”- like trans, n/b, autistic, developmentally handicapped, socially handicapped, awkward, queer, “strange,” brown, wrong religion, wrong clothes, wrong facial expression… the list can go on. The cruelty is the point. Fascists are literally comic levels of evil. If you are not one of “them” you are evil, bad, and need removed. Same for the ideologically impure. Shit is going to get extremely crazy within the next few months to year.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        They’re already underhandedly targeting autistic kids with it as-is. Vocal stims like meowing or nonverbal communication like growling are covered directly.

      • supernicepojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is why I like public schools, they really dont have a lot of choice when admitting students. Kids are little over-creative sociopathic people with some hints of empathy, that can and will cause trouble just because they are bored. Without a public school systems, where we are going, the private school systems will be way pickier and choosier with whom they allow in. Any record of disturbance will probably get a student banned and theyll have to go to another school out of state or further to get an education befitting them.

    • supernicepojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Homey, they about to defund and empty the DoE, every single person in need of an IEP are about to be screwed. The students wont be illegal, they just wont be allowed in the new private school system for espousing anti-social behaviors.

      Edit: I do not adhere or condone destroying the public school system in any way. The fact that the US has been defunding and legislatively attacking public schools since the 60s is deplorable behavior

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        What they don’t realize is that by doing this they are making it easier to replace the United States Federal government. Prior to this Administration one could make the argument that doing our evolution is hard or an advisable because you would have to recreate systems for inspecting the food and predicting the weather and all of that but at this point? We’re going to have to do that anyway so we might as well do so under a fundamentally better system