Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin raised concerns after the justice’s wife reportedly praised an organization’s opposition to Supreme Court reform.

Justice Clarence Thomas faces yet another call to recuse himself, following reporting that his wife, Ginni Thomas, praised a conservative religious group’s opposition to Supreme Court reform. Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin, D-Ill., called on the justice to recuse himself from cases involving that group, the First Liberty Institute.

ProPublica reported that Ginni wrote in an email to the group, “YOU GUYS HAVE FILLED THE SAILS OF MANY JUDGES. CAN I JUST TELL YOU, THANK YOU SO, SO, SO MUCH.”

Of course, calls to reform the court — some of which have been endorsed by President Joe Biden recently — have gained traction due in part to Thomas’ ethics scandals.

  • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 months ago

    They got caught taking bribes and then afterward made an official ruling that “gratuities” are okay and totally not bribes. These corrupt assholes have no shame and will never voluntarily recuse themselves.

  • ulkesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    If there is ever a justice who needs to be impeached and removed.

    But since Congress lacks a spine, it won’t happen. We can only await the inevitable.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh pwetty pwease Mr. Thomas, will you step down from your high paying, low work hour, massively benefit ridden job you’ve had for decades while reaping millions in gifts and kickbacks entirely consequence free?

    I know you have literally zero obligation to do so, but we have no way of forcing you out so we’re just gonna ask, we’ll even give a stern finger wag!

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve already said this twice today since I was so bummed out about it in the debate, but Kamala was handed a PERFECT opportunity to discuss corruption in the courts and she completely missed it for what it was… I don’t even think she realizes what she could have said.

    When Trump went on about all his court wins it was because of corrupt judges picked by the heritage foundation. She could have at least called out Cannon for being Trumps lapdog and could have roped Thomas into it by mentioning his somewhat “random” comment in an unrelated case that was specifically meant to signal to Cannon how she should continue with Trump’s case…

    The elections are about more than just the two douchebags we have to choose from, it’s about the entirety of government. :(